The non-Christian influence on Anselm’s Proslogion argument

This paper considers Anselm’s Proslogion argument against a background of historical events that include philosophical disputes between Christian and Jewish polemicists. I argue that the Proslogion argument was addressed, in part, to non-Christian theists and that it offered a response to Jewish pol...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kendrick, Nancy (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Nature B. V 2011
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2011, Volume: 69, Issue: 2, Pages: 73-89
Further subjects:B Incarnation
B Fittingness
B Necessity
B Existential
B Polemics
B Unbecoming
B Instantiation
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1821413296
003 DE-627
005 20221110052713.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221110s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11153-010-9265-2  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1821413296 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1821413296 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Kendrick, Nancy  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The non-Christian influence on Anselm’s Proslogion argument 
264 1 |c 2011 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper considers Anselm’s Proslogion argument against a background of historical events that include philosophical disputes between Christian and Jewish polemicists. I argue that the Proslogion argument was addressed, in part, to non-Christian theists and that it offered a response to Jewish polemicists who had argued that the Christian conception of God as an instantiated unity was irrational. Anselm is not trying to convince atheists that there really is a God. He is arguing that the Christian conception of God is logically coherent. 
601 |a Influencer 
601 |a Argumentation 
650 4 |a Fittingness 
650 4 |a Unbecoming 
650 4 |a Incarnation 
650 4 |a Polemics 
650 4 |a Instantiation 
650 4 |a Necessity 
650 4 |a Existential 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal for philosophy of religion  |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970  |g 69(2011), 2, Seite 73-89  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320442098  |w (DE-600)2005049-5  |w (DE-576)103746927  |x 1572-8684  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:69  |g year:2011  |g number:2  |g pages:73-89 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/41474775  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-010-9265-2  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4208217308 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1821413296 
LOK |0 005 20221110052713 
LOK |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#46DCF79BE1EDAB3CF9750B28DC646478CE6B54EB 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/41474775 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL