From a Necessary Being to a Perfect Being: A Reply to Byerly
Cosmological arguments for God typically have two stages. The first stage argues for a first cause or a necessary being, and the second stage argues from there to God. T. Ryan Byerly offers a simple, abductive argument for the second stage where the best explanation for why the being is found to hav...
| Subtitles: | "Special Issue - The Future of Philosophy of Religion" |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
2022
|
| In: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2022, Volume: 14, Issue: 1, Pages: 257-268 |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1821177320 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221108124121.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221108s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.24204/ejpr.2022.3446 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1821177320 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1821177320 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Anderson, Tina |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a From a Necessary Being to a Perfect Being |b A Reply to Byerly |
| 246 | 1 | |i Rubrikentitel |a "Special Issue - The Future of Philosophy of Religion" | |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Cosmological arguments for God typically have two stages. The first stage argues for a first cause or a necessary being, and the second stage argues from there to God. T. Ryan Byerly offers a simple, abductive argument for the second stage where the best explanation for why the being is found to have necessary existence is that it is a perfect being. The reasoning behind this argument is that universal generalizations explain observations of their instances; for example, the universal generalization that all ravens are black explains why some particular raven is observed to be black. Similarly, the fact that a being has all perfections explains why we find the being to have necessary existence. I distinguish between two readings of Byerly's proposed theistic explanation, and conclude that his explanation does not offer an advantage to the theist in either case. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t European journal for philosophy of religion |d Innsbruck : University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham, 2009 |g 14(2022), 1, Seite 257-268 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)718600770 |w (DE-600)2659606-4 |w (DE-576)477533728 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:14 |g year:2022 |g number:1 |g pages:257-268 |
| 856 | |u https://philpapers.org/archive/ANDFAN-3.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.2022.3446 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.philosophy-of-religion.eu/index.php/ejpr/article/view/3446 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 936 | u | w | |d 14 |j 2022 |e 1 |h 257-268 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4207426388 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1821177320 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221108123413 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221108||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||