Errors in Converting Principles to Protocols: Where the Bioethics of U.S. Covid-19 Vaccine Allocation Went Wrong
For much of 2021, allocating the scarce supply of Covid-19 vaccines was the world's most pressing bioethical challenge, and similar challenges may recur for novel therapies and future vaccines. In the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee on Imm...
| Authors: | ; ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley
2022
|
| In: |
The Hastings Center report
Year: 2022, Volume: 52, Issue: 5, Pages: 8-14 |
| Further subjects: | B
Covid-19
B Allocation B scarce health care resources B vaccines B Bioethics B Public health |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 181984532X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240717162204.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221025s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1002/hast.1416 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)181984532X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP181984532X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1336043059 |0 (DE-627)1895670705 |4 aut |a Parker, William F. | |
| 109 | |a Parker, William F. |a Parker, William | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Errors in Converting Principles to Protocols: Where the Bioethics of U.S. Covid-19 Vaccine Allocation Went Wrong |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a For much of 2021, allocating the scarce supply of Covid-19 vaccines was the world's most pressing bioethical challenge, and similar challenges may recur for novel therapies and future vaccines. In the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) identified three fundamental ethical principles to guide the process: maximize benefits, promote justice, and mitigate health inequities. We argue that critical components of the recommended protocol were internally inconsistent with these principles. Specifically, the ACIP violated its principles by recommending overly broad health care worker priority in phase 1a, using being at least seventy-five years of age as the only criterion to identify individuals at high risk of death from Covid-19 during phase 1b, failing to recommend place-based vaccine distribution, and implicitly endorsing first-come, first-served allocation. More rigorous empirical work and the development of a complete ethical framework that recognizes trade-offs between principles may have prevented these mistakes and saved lives. | ||
| 601 | |a COVID-19 | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Bioethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a scarce health care resources | |
| 650 | 4 | |a vaccines | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Public Health | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Covid-19 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Allocation | |
| 700 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)127920852X |0 (DE-627)1832491617 |4 aut |a Persad, Govind | |
| 700 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1336043121 |0 (DE-627)1895670829 |4 aut |a Peek, Monica E. | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |a Hastings Center |t The Hastings Center report |d Malden, Mass. : Wiley, 1971 |g 52(2022), 5, Seite 8-14 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341346551 |w (DE-600)2067369-3 |w (DE-576)258761822 |x 1552-146X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:52 |g year:2022 |g number:5 |g pages:8-14 |
| 856 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/hast.1416 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1416 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/hast.1416 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4201584615 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 181984532X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20240717162204 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221025||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-10-24#6683F915E27C6C82069D8ACB811F70B7F61765C9 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Public health |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Santé publique |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Salud pública |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Sanità pubblica |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 公共卫生 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Saúde pública |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Народное здравоохранение |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Δημόσια υγεία |
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Öffentliche Gesundheit,Bevölkerungsgesundheit,Volksgesundheit,Volkshygiene |