Monism in Indian philosophy: the coherence, complexity, and connectivity of reality in Śaṃkara's arguments for Brahman
Classical Indian thought contains a number of arguments for monism that reject the cogency of metaphysical pluralism's account of change, development, and causation in the world. They do this on the basis of (a) the coherence of changes that we see in the world, (b) the difficulty of limning ab...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2022
|
| In: |
Religious studies
Year: 2022, Volume: 58, Issue: S1, Pages: 17-33 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Śaṅkara 788-820
/ Monism
/ Indian philosophy
/ Vedanta
/ Causality
|
| IxTheo Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism BK Hinduism, Jainism, Sikhism |
| Further subjects: | B
Indian Philosophy
B Monism B satkāryavāda B Śaṃkara B Causation B Brahman B Vedanta |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1819831175 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230811113224.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221024s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0034412522000117 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1819831175 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1819831175 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)137316127 |0 (DE-627)591606178 |0 (DE-576)302478760 |4 aut |a Frazier, Jessica |d 1975- | |
| 109 | |a Frazier, Jessica 1975- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Monism in Indian philosophy |b the coherence, complexity, and connectivity of reality in Śaṃkara's arguments for Brahman |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Classical Indian thought contains a number of arguments for monism that reject the cogency of metaphysical pluralism's account of change, development, and causation in the world. They do this on the basis of (a) the coherence of changes that we see in the world, (b) the difficulty of limning absolute distinctions between individuals, and (c) the prerequisite need for some medium explaining causal interactions. This article provides some background to Indian philosophical thought about a basic fabric of reality that grounds changing forms, containing the telos of their evolution in potentia. It then sets out Coherence, Complexity, and Connection Arguments for monism as employed by the Vedāntic scholastic philosopher Śaṃkara. Along the way, we clarify the Vedāntic conception of a single material, efficient, and formal cause that provides a medium for connection and combination, is naturally replete with generative order and impetus, and in which the teloi of all forms are embedded. We will briefly consider what the argument shows, if it succeeds - comparing with current philosophical approaches to monism. Finally, we observe that this rich monism, describing a single vertiginous reality of many levels and powers, is central to classical Hindu conceptions of what makes something ‘divine’. | ||
| 601 | |a Philosophie | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 601 | |a Brahmanen | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Brahman | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Indian Philosophy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Vedānta | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Causation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Monism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a satkāryavāda | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Śaṃkara | |
| 652 | |a AB:BK | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d p |0 (DE-588)118642278 |0 (DE-627)079428711 |0 (DE-576)16439947X |2 gnd |a Śaṅkara |d 788-820 |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4170453-8 |0 (DE-627)105402214 |0 (DE-576)209930373 |2 gnd |a Monismus |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4374155-1 |0 (DE-627)184285798 |0 (DE-576)21176597X |2 gnd |a Indische Philosophie |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4062427-4 |0 (DE-627)104263059 |0 (DE-576)20914419X |2 gnd |a Vedānta |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4030102-3 |0 (DE-627)106271709 |0 (DE-576)208985654 |2 gnd |a Kausalität |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religious studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 |g 58(2022), S1, Seite 17-33 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)265785405 |w (DE-600)1466479-3 |w (DE-576)079718671 |x 1469-901X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:58 |g year:2022 |g number:S1 |g pages:17-33 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412522000117 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/monism-in-indian-philosophy-the-coherence-complexity-and-connectivity-of-reality-in-samkaras-arguments-for-brahman/113B039E710E230A1892E2095A2C31A5 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 936 | u | w | |d 58 |j 2022 |e S1 |h 17-33 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 420139722X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1819831175 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230811113224 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221024||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043571 |a BK | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Brahman,Hinduism,Saccidananda,Satchidānanda,Causality,Causal principle,Causation (Criminal law),Indian philosophy,Monism,Vedanta |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Brahmane,Causalité (droit pénal),Causalité,Monisme,Philosophie indienne,Védanta |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Brahman,Causalidad,Causalidad,Filosofía indiana,Monismo,Vedanta |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Brahman,Causalità,Filosofia indiana,Monismo,Vedanta |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 一元论,印度哲学,吠檀多,因果关系,因果性,梵 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 一元論,印度哲學,吠檀多,因果關係,因果性,梵 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Brâman,Causalidade,Filosofia indiana,Monismo,Vedanta |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Брахман,Веданта,Индийская философия,Казуальность,Монизм |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Αιτιότητα,Βεδάντα,Βεντάντα,Βραχμάνος,Ινδική φιλοσοφία,Μονισμός |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Hinduismus,Saccidananda,Satchidānanda , Wedanta |
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Śaṅkarācārya,788-820,Ādi Śaṅkara,788-820,Adi Shankaracarya,788-820,Āticaṅkar,788-820,Āticaṅkarācāriyar,788-820,Āticaṅkarācārya,Svāmikaḷ,788-820,Āticaṅkarar,788-820,Çamkara,788-820,Camkaracarya,788-820,Caṃkarâcārya,788-820,Çaṅkara,788-820,Caṅkarācārya,Svāmikaḷ,788-820,Śaṃkara,788-820,Śaṃkarā Ācārya,788-820,Śaṁkara,Ācārya,788-820,Śaṃkara-Bhagavatpāda,788-820,Śaṃkara-bhagavat-pāda,788-820,Śaṃkarabhayatpāda,788-820,Śaṃkarācārya,788-820,Sankara Áchárya,788-820,Śankara A'cha'rya,788-820,Śankara Ácharya,788-820,Śaṅkara Bhagavatpāda,788-820,Śaṅkara Bhagavatpādācārya,788-820,Sankara Bhagavatpadacharya,788-820,Śaṅkara,Ācārya,788-820,Śaṅkarabhagavatpādācārya,788-820,Sankaracharya,788-820,Śankarāchāryas,788-820,Saṅkarākārya,788-820,Sankaráchárya,788-820,Shamkaracharya,788-820,Shang-chieh-lo,788-820,Shangjieluo,788-820,Shankara,788-820,Śrīsankarācārya,788-820,Shankaracarya, Adi,788-820,Śamkara,788-820,Shankara Acharya,788-820,Śankara Áchárya,788-820,Śaṅkara Āchārya,788-820,Schamkara,788-820,Schankara,788-820,Shankaracharya,788-820,Shankarâchârya,788-820 , Wedanta , Kausalprinzip,Notwendige Verknüpfung,Notwendiger Zusammenhang,Kausalzusammenhang,Kausalgesetz |