A Response to Wolfart’s “Religious Literacy”: Some Considerations and Reservations
This text addresses three related aspects of Wolfart’s article on religious literacy: the critique of assumptions on the outcome of increased religious literacy, questions about the purpose of religious education, and the suggestion that religious studies are ex-theological. Although the predictabil...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
2022
|
In: |
Method & theory in the study of religion
Year: 2022, Volume: 34, Issue: 5, Pages: 453-464 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Religion
/ Knowledge
/ Religious pedagogy
/ Science of Religion
/ Theology
/ Educational philosophy
|
IxTheo Classification: | AA Study of religion AH Religious education |
Further subjects: | B
Commentary
B Religious Education B Educational Philosophy B ex-theology B Gert J.J. Biesta B Religious Literacy |
Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 181851544X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230801095739.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221011s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/15700682-bja10079 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)181851544X | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP181851544X | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1077755775 |0 (DE-627)83745199X |0 (DE-576)446376248 |4 aut |a Enstedt, Daniel | |
109 | |a Enstedt, Daniel | ||
245 | 1 | 2 | |a A Response to Wolfart’s “Religious Literacy”: Some Considerations and Reservations |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This text addresses three related aspects of Wolfart’s article on religious literacy: the critique of assumptions on the outcome of increased religious literacy, questions about the purpose of religious education, and the suggestion that religious studies are ex-theological. Although the predictability of the results of certain classroom activities presents a fundamental problem, I argue that the tentative and generic abilities highlighted in the religious literacy discourse may function as a starting point to elaborate on a better definition of religious literacy in religious studies. Moreover, based on Biesta’s educational philosophy, I argue that the religious literacy discourse is about learnification in rhetorical disguise as value-based education. Instead, I suggest that the purpose of religious education should be (re)considered from Biesta’s three dimensions of qualification, socialization, and subjectification. Finally, I problematize Wolfart’s suggestion that religious studies are ex-theological and conclude that, although there are a theological dimension and a genealogy to be observed in the religious literacy discourse, other kinds of scholarly aspects are also worth exploring further. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Educational Philosophy | |
650 | 4 | |a Gert J.J. Biesta | |
650 | 4 | |a ex-theology | |
650 | 4 | |a Religious Education | |
650 | 4 | |a Religious Literacy | |
652 | |a AA:AH | ||
655 | 7 | |a Kommentar |0 (DE-588)4136710-8 |0 (DE-627)104500719 |0 (DE-576)209671467 |2 gnd-content | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4049396-9 |0 (DE-627)106187155 |0 (DE-576)209081880 |2 gnd |a Religion |
689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4066559-8 |0 (DE-627)106113100 |0 (DE-576)209165111 |2 gnd |a Wissen |
689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4049412-3 |0 (DE-627)10451681X |0 (DE-576)209081937 |2 gnd |a Religionspädagogik |
689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4049426-3 |0 (DE-627)106187058 |0 (DE-576)209082003 |2 gnd |a Religionswissenschaft |
689 | 0 | 4 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4059758-1 |0 (DE-627)104131446 |0 (DE-576)209132159 |2 gnd |a Theologie |
689 | 0 | 5 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4070955-3 |0 (DE-627)106099000 |0 (DE-576)209182377 |2 gnd |a Erziehungsphilosophie |
689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Method & theory in the study of religion |d Leiden : Brill, 1989 |g 34(2022), 5, Seite 453-464 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)34189656X |w (DE-600)2069397-7 |w (DE-576)100668399 |x 1570-0682 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:34 |g year:2022 |g number:5 |g pages:453-464 |
787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kommentar zu |a Wolfart, Johannes C., 1966 - |t ‘Religious Literacy’: Some Considerations and Reservations |d 2022 |w (DE-627)1818515415 |
856 | |u https://brill.com/downloadpdf/journals/mtsr/34/5/article-p453_4.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via page says license)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-bja10079 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://brill.com/view/journals/mtsr/34/5/article-p453_4.xml |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4195912210 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 181851544X | ||
LOK | |0 005 20230801095739 | ||
LOK | |0 008 221011||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-10-10#6A4CC8F0D456346D8131E855DB02DCFC7BE27791 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042966 |a AA | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1550364804 |a AH | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Educational philosophy,Philosophy of Education,Philosophical pedagogy,Pedagogy,Pedagogic philosophy,Knowledge,Religion,Religion in literature,Religions,Religion,Religious pedagogy,Religious education,Science of Religion,Religious studies,Religionswissenschaft,Religions,Theology,Theology |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Philosophie de l'éducation,Pédagogie des religions,Religion,Religions,Religion,Savoir,Science des religions,Théologie,Théologie |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Ciencias de la religión,Filosofía de la educación,Pedagogía de la religión,Religión,Religión,Religión,Saber,Conocimiento,Conocimiento,Teología,Teología |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Filosofia dell'educazione,Pedagogia della religione,Religione,Religione,Religione,Sapere,Scienze religiose,Teologia,Teologia |
STE | 0 | 0 | |a 宗教,宗教,宗教学,宗教教育,教育理念,教育原理,知识,神学家 |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 宗教,宗教,宗教學,宗教教育,教育理念,教育原理,知識,神學家 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Ciências da religião,Filosofia da educação,Pedagogia da religião,Religião,Religião,Saber,Conhecimento,Conhecimento,Teologia,Teologia |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Богословие (мотив),Богословие,Знание,Педагогика религии,Религиоведение,Религия,Религия (мотив),Философия воспитания |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Γνώση,Θεολογία (μοτίβο),Θεολογία,Θρησκεία,Θρησκεία (μοτίβο),Θρησκειολογία,Θρησκευτική παιδαγωγική,Φιλοσοφία της εκπαίδευσης,Εκπαιδευτική φιλοσοφία |
SUB | |a REL | ||
SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Religion,Mystik,Mythologie , Kenntnis <Wissen>,Kenntnisse,Kenntnis,Kenntnisse , Religious studies,Religionsphilosophie,Scholasticism,Scholastik,Theologie,Theology,Religionsforschung , Christliche Theologie , Bildungsphilosophie,Erziehung,Pädagogik,Pädagogische Philosophie,Philosophische Pädagogik |