Cartesian Dualism and the Intermediate State: A Reply to Turner Jr

In this paper, I propose to analyse two objections raised by Turner Jr in his paper “On Two Reasons Christian Theologians Should Reject The Intermediate State” in order to show that the intermediate state is an incoherent theory. As we shall see, the two untoward consequences that he mentions do not...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Perez Chamorro, Daniel Alejandro (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Università della Santa Croce 2019
In:Sonderdruck aus: Forum: Supplement to Acta Philosophica (2498-9746) Vol. 5, no.1, p. 269-281 (2019)
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000002 4500
001 1818389886
003 DE-627
005 20221010171230.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221010s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 2078.1/226312  |2 hdl 
035 |a (DE-627)1818389886 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1818389886 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Perez Chamorro, Daniel Alejandro  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Cartesian Dualism and the Intermediate State: A Reply to Turner Jr 
264 1 |b Università della Santa Croce  |c 2019 
264 2 |a Louvain  |b Université catholique de Louvain  |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In this paper, I propose to analyse two objections raised by Turner Jr in his paper “On Two Reasons Christian Theologians Should Reject The Intermediate State” in order to show that the intermediate state is an incoherent theory. As we shall see, the two untoward consequences that he mentions do not imply a metaphysical or logical contradiction. Consequently, I shall defend an Intermediate State and I shall propose briefly one metaphysical conception of the human being able to reply to Turner Jr’s objections. 
773 0 8 |i Sonderdruck aus  |t Forum: Supplement to Acta Philosophica  |g Vol. 5, no.1, p. 269-281 (2019)  |x 2498-9746 
856 4 0 |u http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/226312  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
935 |c so 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4195810191 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1818389886 
LOK |0 005 20221010171230 
LOK |0 008 221010||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-10-05#1130B7C0A8E7051CD60C9E3F069E04EA83FEC21B 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a rplv 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw