Christologie in der Spannung zwischen biblischem Kerygma und konziliarer Lehre: Bemerkungen zu einem wichtigen Buch
The article offers a critical evaluation of the book by H.-J. Schulz, Bekenntnis statt Dogma. Kriterien der Verbindlichkeit kirchlicher Lehre (QD 163). Freiburg i. Br. 1996. The author participates in the concern of Schulz, who tries to establish criteria, by which pronuntiations of the ecclesiastic...
| Published in: | Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Review |
| Language: | German |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Echter
1998
|
| In: |
Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie
|
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Christology
/ Development of dogma
/ Council
/ History 325-787
|
| Further subjects: | B
Doctrine
B Book review B Christology B Scriptural principle B Bible |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
| Summary: | The article offers a critical evaluation of the book by H.-J. Schulz, Bekenntnis statt Dogma. Kriterien der Verbindlichkeit kirchlicher Lehre (QD 163). Freiburg i. Br. 1996. The author participates in the concern of Schulz, who tries to establish criteria, by which pronuntiations of the ecclesiastical authorities can be analised according to their obligatory character. However, he tries, starting from the new hermeneutical principles for our understandig of Scripture and Tradition, as established by the Second Vatican Council, to draw conclusions, which go further than the ones reached in the book by Schulz. This is shown above all with the example of the christological and trinitarian doctrines pronounced by the first ecumenical councils. |
|---|---|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie
|