Imperial Church Building and Church-State Relations, A.D. 313–363

The study of church-state relations in the age of Constantine may be approached in many ways. Imperial church building is one of these avenues of study and interpretation. Lactantius long ago complained of the building mania of Diocletian and other members of the Tetrarchy. Eusebius lauded the churc...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Armstrong, Gregory T. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 1967
In: Church history
Year: 1967, Volume: 36, Issue: 1, Pages: 3-17
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1817629204
003 DE-627
005 20220928122054.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220928s1967 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2307/3162340  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1817629204 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1817629204 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Armstrong, Gregory T.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Imperial Church Building and Church-State Relations, A.D. 313–363 
264 1 |c 1967 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The study of church-state relations in the age of Constantine may be approached in many ways. Imperial church building is one of these avenues of study and interpretation. Lactantius long ago complained of the building mania of Diocletian and other members of the Tetrarchy. Eusebius lauded the churches of Constantine as signal proofs of his magnificence and as the discharge of a sacred debt. Procopius later condemned the extravagance of Justinian's building programs, although without specifically mentioning churches. And many modern writers have taken the churches of Constantine as evidence for both a personal and a public commitment to Christianity. Only a few historians, however, have asked whether there was an overriding plan or purpose to this activity, e.g., Glanville Downey has suggested the likelihood of a plan in the case of Justinian. Thus arises the question, was the construction of churches the instrument or at least the reflection of an imperial policy toward Christianity? 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Church history  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1932  |g 36(1967), 1, Seite 3-17  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)340877057  |w (DE-600)2066135-6  |w (DE-576)114617899  |x 1755-2613  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:36  |g year:1967  |g number:1  |g pages:3-17 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n elektronische Ausgabe  |w (DE-627)1647150841  |k Electronic 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/3162340  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2307/3162340  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/church-history/article/imperial-church-building-and-churchstate-relations-ad-313363/8589010E02426A253B1A9982F6F6F636  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 36  |j 1967  |e 1  |h 3-17 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4192573091 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1817629204 
LOK |0 005 20220928052644 
LOK |0 008 220928||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-27#2544DE9E61AD8F8903F650F3342485C32151539B 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/3162340 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw