Friedrich Schleiermacher on the Old Testament

In the nineteenth century the unrestricted application of the historical-critical method posed an unprecedented challenge to inherited Christian notions about the Bible. While this challenge was eventually to be felt most acutely in the study of the New Testament (nt) once the distinction between th...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Capetz, Paul E. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2009
In: Harvard theological review
Year: 2009, Volume: 102, Issue: 3, Pages: 297-326
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1817624539
003 DE-627
005 20220928142138.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220928s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0017816009000819  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1817624539 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1817624539 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Capetz, Paul E.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Friedrich Schleiermacher on the Old Testament 
264 1 |c 2009 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In the nineteenth century the unrestricted application of the historical-critical method posed an unprecedented challenge to inherited Christian notions about the Bible. While this challenge was eventually to be felt most acutely in the study of the New Testament (nt) once the distinction between the “Jesus of history” and the “Christ of faith” had firmly established itself, traditional viewpoints on the Old Testament (ot) were actually the first to be called into question. As a consequence of historical investigation, it became increasingly difficult for theologians to claim that the gospel is already taught in the ot. Regarding this matter, Friedrich Schleiermacher (1768–1834) made a bold proposal. He argued against the canonical standing of the ot on the grounds that it expresses Jewish, not Christian, religion. For him this conclusion was the unavoidable result of the advancing critical scholarship that was undermining the christological exegesis used to defend the church's claim to the ot against the synagogue's counter-claim to its sole rightful possession. Opposing such “christianizing” readings, Schleiermacher broke ranks from Christian theologians and championed the side of the Jews in this historic debate. His only predecessors in this regard were Marcion and the Socinians, although his proposal for relegating the ot to noncanonical status was later endorsed by Adolf von Harnack. 
601 |a Schleiermacher, Friedrich 
601 |a Testament 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Harvard theological review  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1908  |g 102(2009), 3, Seite 297-326  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)331504553  |w (DE-600)2051494-3  |w (DE-576)094533326  |x 1475-4517  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:102  |g year:2009  |g number:3  |g pages:297-326 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1646236130  |k Non-Electronic 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40390019  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017816009000819  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/harvard-theological-review/article/friedrich-schleiermacher-on-the-old-testament/1CC30A7E7E238011DC49B413346BBE08  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 419256842X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1817624539 
LOK |0 005 20220928052626 
LOK |0 008 220928||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-27#DDC088B91FEB745487D02D1F6205E7CDCDA0291C 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40390019 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
SUB |a BIB