Rabbinic Law between Biblical Logic and Biblical Text: The Pitfalls of Exodus 21:33–34

When the justices of the U.S. Supreme Court conclude that some law, or some decision of a lower court, violates the U.S. Constitution, no great difficulties of principle or sentiment need accompany their decision to abrogate the opinions of the earlier legislators or judges. The justices, and others...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Schwartz, Daniel R. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2014
In: Harvard theological review
Year: 2014, Volume: 107, Issue: 3, Pages: 314-339
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1817623915
003 DE-627
005 20220928142038.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220928s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0017816014000303  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1817623915 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1817623915 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Schwartz, Daniel R.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Rabbinic Law between Biblical Logic and Biblical Text: The Pitfalls of Exodus 21:33–34 
264 1 |c 2014 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a When the justices of the U.S. Supreme Court conclude that some law, or some decision of a lower court, violates the U.S. Constitution, no great difficulties of principle or sentiment need accompany their decision to abrogate the opinions of the earlier legislators or judges. The justices, and others, are expected to understand their decision either as correcting a mistake that had been introduced by fallible people who, with intentions good or bad, or unintentionally, had violated the system's basic rulebook, or as reflecting the fact that since the time those legislators or judges made their decisions something relevant (such as notions of “cruel and unusual punishment” or of what affects interstate commerce) had changed, so what was once constitutionally acceptable no longer is. Thus, however upsetting the substance of the justices’ decision may be, it need not imply a condemnation of their predecessors nor entail a disruption of the system's authority structures—as is seen in the fact that the justices, and American citizens, readily use such explicit verbs as “reverse,” “strike down,” or “overturned” for what the justices do 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Harvard theological review  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1908  |g 107(2014), 3, Seite 314-339  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)331504553  |w (DE-600)2051494-3  |w (DE-576)094533326  |x 1475-4517  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:107  |g year:2014  |g number:3  |g pages:314-339 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1640107754  |k Non-Electronic 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/43297577  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017816014000303  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/harvard-theological-review/article/rabbinic-law-between-biblical-logic-and-biblical-text-the-pitfalls-of-exodus-213334/32F4D967023D726E1CC85DF09B1E92FA  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
CAN |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4192567806 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1817623915 
LOK |0 005 20220928052624 
LOK |0 008 220928||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-27#B23C7A447406B6567A267E922E9CAD8122D92BDB 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/43297577 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a CAN  |a BIB  |a REL