Die Erklärung von Stuttgart und ihre Interpretationen: Versuch einer psychoanalytischen Kritik

Accordingly to the well-known writers on psycho-analytical subjects, Alexander and Margarete Mitscherlich, German society in the post-1945 period suffered from political and social immobility because of a basic incapacity to repent. This arose because of a narcissistic nationalism and deployment of...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tillmanns, Adrian (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:German
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 1994
In: Kirchliche Zeitgeschichte
Year: 1994, Volume: 7, Issue: 1, Pages: 59-82
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1817497340
003 DE-627
005 20220927053153.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220927s1994 xx |||||o 00| ||ger c
035 |a (DE-627)1817497340 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1817497340 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a ger 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Tillmanns, Adrian  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a Die Erklärung von Stuttgart und ihre Interpretationen: Versuch einer psychoanalytischen Kritik 
264 1 |c 1994 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Accordingly to the well-known writers on psycho-analytical subjects, Alexander and Margarete Mitscherlich, German society in the post-1945 period suffered from political and social immobility because of a basic incapacity to repent. This arose because of a narcissistic nationalism and deployment of psychic energies in rejecting notions of guilt, which took a variety of forms, and resulted in creating an atmosphere of false or unrealistic consciousness. Even though, at first glance, the Stuttgart Declaration of Guilt of October 1945 sought to express a statement of repentance, it still displayed numerous marks of a defensive mentality. In particular, it relied on the theory that the catastrophe of the Nazi years was due to the universal spread of secularism. By so doing it downplayed the specifically German character of the Nazi regime and sought to relativise its crimes as part of the world-wide overthrow of moral and religious values. This enabled its authors to seek to identify themselves with the churches of the victorious nations, and to call for the "re-Christianization" of the whole of European society. But, at the same time, the Declaration could have been an opportunity for repenting of Germany's particular sins. Yet this opportunity was largely ignored. Already in his commentary, which accompanied the issuance of the Declaration, Pastor Asmussen only added to the unreal atmosphere by placing his central emphasis on the unexamined elements of his church's tradition, such as the doctrine of the Two Kingdoms, or the heritage of German national Protestantism. These arguments resulted in the kind of immobility which effectively hampered any true repentance. By adopting a strong position of sympathy for the German people in their hour of distress, Asmussen soon became an advocate of a defensive blocking off of ideas of guilt. By contrast, Martin Niemöller in 1945 expressed deep concern for the necessity of recognizing Germany's and the church's guilt, and so assisted the task of repentance. He sought to impress his audiences in numerous lectures and sermons with the need to examine the past, to face the facts and to prevent any repetition. But even he could not free himself from his strongly nationalistic identifications, which resulted in his eventual denunciation of the denazification steps undertaken by the military governments, and his call of February 1948 for a boycott of such measures.. 
601 |a Stuttgart 
601 |a Interpretation 
601 |a Versuchung 
601 |a Psychoanalytiker 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Kirchliche Zeitgeschichte  |d Göttingen : Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1988  |g 7(1994), 1, Seite 59-82  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)557487943  |w (DE-600)2404347-3  |w (DE-576)27681875X  |x 2196-808X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:7  |g year:1994  |g number:1  |g pages:59-82 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)596552084  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/43750699  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4192090341 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1817497340 
LOK |0 005 20220927053153 
LOK |0 008 220927||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-08-22#CBEFBE7FB3E523955D7C670A1AE9564FA49D462C 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw