Contractualism and Radical Pluralism

How should contractualists seek to accommodate and respond to the existence of radical pluralism within contemporary liberal states? Ryan Muldoon has recently argued that a) the dominant Kantian liberal model of contractualism is hopelessly ill equipped to do so but that b) there is a particular kin...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Southwood, Nicholas (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2019
In: Journal of moral philosophy
Year: 2019, Volume: 16, Issue: 2, Pages: 225-238
Further subjects:B Pluralism
B Diversity
B Contractarianism
B Disagreement
B Contractualism
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1817477560
003 DE-627
005 20220927053016.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220927s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/17455243-01602001  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1817477560 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1817477560 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Southwood, Nicholas  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Contractualism and Radical Pluralism 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a How should contractualists seek to accommodate and respond to the existence of radical pluralism within contemporary liberal states? Ryan Muldoon has recently argued that a) the dominant Kantian liberal model of contractualism is hopelessly ill equipped to do so but that b) there is a particular kind of Hobbesian contractualism that can do much better. I raise some problems concerning the capacity of Muldoonian contractualism to respond appropriately to the problem of radical pluralism. I then propose a very different kind of solution that involves embracing an advice model of contractualism. 
650 4 |a Disagreement 
650 4 |a Diversity 
650 4 |a Pluralism 
650 4 |a Contractarianism 
650 4 |a Contractualism 
650 4 |a Disagreement 
650 4 |a Diversity 
650 4 |a Pluralism 
650 4 |a Contractarianism 
650 4 |a Contractualism 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of moral philosophy  |d Leiden : Brill, 2004  |g 16(2019), 2, Seite 225-238  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)474382281  |w (DE-600)2169771-1  |w (DE-576)273875329  |x 1745-5243  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:16  |g year:2019  |g number:2  |g pages:225-238 
856 |u http://hdl.handle.net/1885/196749  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH doi match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-01602001  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/jmp/16/2/article-p225_225.xml  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 16  |j 2019  |e 2  |h 225-238 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4192070561 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1817477560 
LOK |0 005 20220927053016 
LOK |0 008 220927||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-23#535B8C5D06C9D0C66D817391ACD6414F5765A4E5 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw