Process Democracy

Abstract Democratic theorists have proposed a number of competing justifications for democratic order, but no theory has achieved a consensus. While expecting consensus may be unrealistic, I nonetheless contend that we can make progress in justifying democratic order by applying competing democratic...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vallier, Kevin (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2020
In: Journal of moral philosophy
Year: 2020, Volume: 17, Issue: 6, Pages: 633-657
Further subjects:B aggregative democracy
B Deliberative Democracy
B Democracy
B Political Legitimacy
B democratic legitimacy
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1817475533
003 DE-627
005 20220927053011.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220927s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/17455243-20203026  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1817475533 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1817475533 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Vallier, Kevin  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Process Democracy 
264 1 |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Abstract Democratic theorists have proposed a number of competing justifications for democratic order, but no theory has achieved a consensus. While expecting consensus may be unrealistic, I nonetheless contend that we can make progress in justifying democratic order by applying competing democratic theories to different stages of the democratic process. In particular, I argue that the selection of political officials should be governed in accord with aggregative democracy. This process should prize widespread participation, political equality, and proper preference aggregation. I then argue that the selection of public policies by political officials should be governed in accord with deliberative democracy. This process should prize high quality deliberation and political equality. A process democracy is a democracy that joins an aggregative process for selecting officials with a deliberative process for selecting policies. Democracy is justified and legitimate when it is structured in this way. 
650 4 |a Political Legitimacy 
650 4 |a democratic legitimacy 
650 4 |a aggregative democracy 
650 4 |a Deliberative Democracy 
650 4 |a Democracy 
650 4 |a Political Legitimacy 
650 4 |a democratic legitimacy 
650 4 |a aggregative democracy 
650 4 |a Deliberative Democracy 
650 4 |a Democracy 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of moral philosophy  |d Leiden : Brill, 2004  |g 17(2020), 6, Seite 633-657  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)474382281  |w (DE-600)2169771-1  |w (DE-576)273875329  |x 1745-5243  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:17  |g year:2020  |g number:6  |g pages:633-657 
856 |u https://brill.com/downloadpdf/journals/jmp/17/6/article-p633_633.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-20203026  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/jmp/17/6/article-p633_633.xml  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4192068532 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1817475533 
LOK |0 005 20220927053011 
LOK |0 008 220927||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-22#42765348AED756EAF1E47A1A51EA91BB94978BD8 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw