The Quality of Gooditude
In this review essay, I first analyze the main tenets of Larry Temkin’s Rethinking the Good and, in particular, his claim that the goodness of state of affairs may not be transitive. I examine one of the key examples of the book, and how it is intended to underwrite this claim. Next I describe the d...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
2015
|
In: |
Journal of moral philosophy
Year: 2015, Volume: 12, Issue: 4, Pages: 393-413 |
Further subjects: | B
Incommensurability
B transitivity B Utilitarianism B World Health Organisation B goodness of state of affairs B Temkin B Rawls B Consequentialism |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1817474839 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220927053009.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220927s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/17455243-01204002 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1817474839 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1817474839 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Munoz-Dardé, Véronique |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Quality of Gooditude |
264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a In this review essay, I first analyze the main tenets of Larry Temkin’s Rethinking the Good and, in particular, his claim that the goodness of state of affairs may not be transitive. I examine one of the key examples of the book, and how it is intended to underwrite this claim. Next I describe the difference between the threat of non-transitivity and the idea of incommensurability. I also consider the plausibility of what Temkin calls the Essentially Comparative View, and explore possible responses to examples of seeming non-transitivity. I also raise some doubts regarding Temkin’s interpretation of ‘the separateness of persons’ and Rawls’ complaints against utilitarians. Finally, I envisage whether Temkin’s theoretical perspective helps us understand practical dilemmas that organizations such as the World Health Organization face. | ||
650 | 4 | |a World Health Organisation | |
650 | 4 | |a Rawls | |
650 | 4 | |a goodness of state of affairs | |
650 | 4 | |a Consequentialism | |
650 | 4 | |a Utilitarianism | |
650 | 4 | |a Incommensurability | |
650 | 4 | |a transitivity | |
650 | 4 | |a Temkin | |
650 | 4 | |a World Health Organisation | |
650 | 4 | |a Rawls | |
650 | 4 | |a goodness of state of affairs | |
650 | 4 | |a Consequentialism | |
650 | 4 | |a Utilitarianism | |
650 | 4 | |a Incommensurability | |
650 | 4 | |a transitivity | |
650 | 4 | |a Temkin | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of moral philosophy |d Leiden : Brill, 2004 |g 12(2015), 4, Seite 393-413 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)474382281 |w (DE-600)2169771-1 |w (DE-576)273875329 |x 1745-5243 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:12 |g year:2015 |g number:4 |g pages:393-413 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-01204002 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://brill.com/view/journals/jmp/12/4/article-p393_2.xml |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4192067838 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1817474839 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220927053009 | ||
LOK | |0 008 220927||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-22#2292BF2CB8AEF86A16842C5784AA5465CE098DC7 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |