Autonomy and Orthonomy

The ideal of personal autonomy faces a challenge from advocates of orthonomy, who think good government should displace self-government. These critics claim that autonomy is an arbitrary kind of psychological harmony and that we should instead concentrate on ensuring our motivations and deliberation...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: O’Shea, Tom (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2015
In: Journal of moral philosophy
Year: 2015, Volume: 12, Issue: 5, Pages: 619-637
Further subjects:B John Christman
B Rationality
B Michael Smith
B orthonomy
B Phillip Pettit
B Autonomy
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1817474227
003 DE-627
005 20220927053007.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220927s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/17455243-4681051  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1817474227 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1817474227 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a O’Shea, Tom  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Autonomy and Orthonomy 
264 1 |c 2015 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The ideal of personal autonomy faces a challenge from advocates of orthonomy, who think good government should displace self-government. These critics claim that autonomy is an arbitrary kind of psychological harmony and that we should instead concentrate on ensuring our motivations and deliberations are responsive to reasons. This paper recasts these objections as part of an intramural debate between approaches to autonomy that accept or reject the requirement for robust rational capacities. It argues that autonomy depends upon such responsiveness to reasons, countering objections that ‘externalist’ rationalist criteria strip the self from self-government. 
601 |a Autonomie 
650 4 |a John Christman 
650 4 |a Michael Smith 
650 4 |a Phillip Pettit 
650 4 |a Rationality 
650 4 |a orthonomy 
650 4 |a Autonomy 
650 4 |a John Christman 
650 4 |a Michael Smith 
650 4 |a Phillip Pettit 
650 4 |a Rationality 
650 4 |a orthonomy 
650 4 |a Autonomy 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of moral philosophy  |d Leiden : Brill, 2004  |g 12(2015), 5, Seite 619-637  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)474382281  |w (DE-600)2169771-1  |w (DE-576)273875329  |x 1745-5243  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:12  |g year:2015  |g number:5  |g pages:619-637 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-4681051  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/jmp/12/5/article-p619_3.xml  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 12  |j 2015  |e 5  |h 619-637 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4192067226 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1817474227 
LOK |0 005 20220927053007 
LOK |0 008 220927||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-22#545AE6AABB60E95156F26F387E875BAC2066802F 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw