Précis of Moral Error Theory: History, Critique, Defence

Moral error theorists and moral realists agree about several disputed metaethical issues. They typically agree that ordinary moral judgments are beliefs and that ordinary moral utterances purport to refer to moral facts. But they disagree on the crucial ontological question of whether there are any...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Olson, Jonas (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2016
In: Journal of moral philosophy
Year: 2016, Volume: 13, Issue: 4, Pages: 397-402
Further subjects:B queerness
B Mackie
B moral error theory
B Hume
B irreducible normativity
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1817473956
003 DE-627
005 20220927053007.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220927s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/17455243-01304001  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1817473956 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1817473956 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Olson, Jonas  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Précis of Moral Error Theory: History, Critique, Defence 
264 1 |c 2016 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Moral error theorists and moral realists agree about several disputed metaethical issues. They typically agree that ordinary moral judgments are beliefs and that ordinary moral utterances purport to refer to moral facts. But they disagree on the crucial ontological question of whether there are any moral facts. Moral error theorists hold that there are not and that, as a consequence, ordinary moral beliefs are systematically mistaken and ordinary moral judgments uniformly untrue. Perhaps because of its kinship with moral realism, moral error theory is often considered the most notorious of moral scepticisms. While the view has been widely discussed, it has had relatively few defenders. Moral Error Theory: History, Critique, Defence (henceforth met) examines the view from a historical as well as a contemporary perspective, and purports to respond to some of its most prominent challenges. This précis is a brief summary of the book’s content. 
601 |a Historie 
650 4 |a queerness 
650 4 |a moral error theory 
650 4 |a Mackie 
650 4 |a irreducible normativity 
650 4 |a Hume 
650 4 |a queerness 
650 4 |a moral error theory 
650 4 |a Mackie 
650 4 |a irreducible normativity 
650 4 |a Hume 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of moral philosophy  |d Leiden : Brill, 2004  |g 13(2016), 4, Seite 397-402  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)474382281  |w (DE-600)2169771-1  |w (DE-576)273875329  |x 1745-5243  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:13  |g year:2016  |g number:4  |g pages:397-402 
856 |u http://su.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:951220/FULLTEXT01  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH doi match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-01304001  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/jmp/13/4/article-p397_1.xml  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4192066955 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1817473956 
LOK |0 005 20220927053007 
LOK |0 008 220927||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-22#F7C221978536BDD6A249661744D209314EB0FFF6 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw