Political Liberalism and Political Compliance: Part 2 of The Problem of Political Compliance in Rawls’s Theories of Justice

Abstract Three interlocking features appear to underpin Rawls’s justification of political compliance within the context of political liberalism: namely, a specific territory; a specific society; and a specific conception of what it is to be reasonable. When any one feature is subject to critical ex...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Carter, Alan (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2006
In: Journal of moral philosophy
Year: 2006, Volume: 3, Issue: 2, Pages: 135-157
Further subjects:B political duties
B Political Liberalism
B philosophical anarchism
B Rawls
B Political Obligation
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1817473743
003 DE-627
005 20220927053006.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220927s2006 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/1740468106065489  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1817473743 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1817473743 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Carter, Alan  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Political Liberalism and Political Compliance: Part 2 of The Problem of Political Compliance in Rawls’s Theories of Justice 
264 1 |c 2006 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Abstract Three interlocking features appear to underpin Rawls’s justification of political compliance within the context of political liberalism: namely, a specific territory; a specific society; and a specific conception of what it is to be reasonable. When any one feature is subject to critical examination, while presupposing that the other two are acceptable, Rawls’s argument for political compliance may seem persuasive. But when all three features are critically examined together, his justification of political compliance within political liberalism can be seen to lack cogency. Thus, political compliance fails to be justified by a free-standing political liberalism. 
601 |a Compliance 
601 |a Problem 
650 4 |a Political Obligation 
650 4 |a Political Liberalism 
650 4 |a political duties 
650 4 |a philosophical anarchism 
650 4 |a Rawls 
650 4 |a Political Obligation 
650 4 |a Political Liberalism 
650 4 |a political duties 
650 4 |a philosophical anarchism 
650 4 |a Rawls 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of moral philosophy  |d Leiden : Brill, 2004  |g 3(2006), 2, Seite 135-157  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)474382281  |w (DE-600)2169771-1  |w (DE-576)273875329  |x 1745-5243  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:3  |g year:2006  |g number:2  |g pages:135-157 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/1740468106065489  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/jmp/3/2/article-p135_2.xml  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4192066742 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1817473743 
LOK |0 005 20220927053006 
LOK |0 008 220927||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-22#720549805E33EECCDA4147734335E32B83B2FC2C 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw