Political Liberalism and Political Compliance: Part 2 of The Problem of Political Compliance in Rawls’s Theories of Justice
Abstract Three interlocking features appear to underpin Rawls’s justification of political compliance within the context of political liberalism: namely, a specific territory; a specific society; and a specific conception of what it is to be reasonable. When any one feature is subject to critical ex...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
2006
|
In: |
Journal of moral philosophy
Year: 2006, Volume: 3, Issue: 2, Pages: 135-157 |
Further subjects: | B
political duties
B Political Liberalism B philosophical anarchism B Rawls B Political Obligation |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1817473743 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220927053006.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220927s2006 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/1740468106065489 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1817473743 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1817473743 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Carter, Alan |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Political Liberalism and Political Compliance: Part 2 of The Problem of Political Compliance in Rawls’s Theories of Justice |
264 | 1 | |c 2006 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Abstract Three interlocking features appear to underpin Rawls’s justification of political compliance within the context of political liberalism: namely, a specific territory; a specific society; and a specific conception of what it is to be reasonable. When any one feature is subject to critical examination, while presupposing that the other two are acceptable, Rawls’s argument for political compliance may seem persuasive. But when all three features are critically examined together, his justification of political compliance within political liberalism can be seen to lack cogency. Thus, political compliance fails to be justified by a free-standing political liberalism. | ||
601 | |a Compliance | ||
601 | |a Problem | ||
650 | 4 | |a Political Obligation | |
650 | 4 | |a Political Liberalism | |
650 | 4 | |a political duties | |
650 | 4 | |a philosophical anarchism | |
650 | 4 | |a Rawls | |
650 | 4 | |a Political Obligation | |
650 | 4 | |a Political Liberalism | |
650 | 4 | |a political duties | |
650 | 4 | |a philosophical anarchism | |
650 | 4 | |a Rawls | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of moral philosophy |d Leiden : Brill, 2004 |g 3(2006), 2, Seite 135-157 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)474382281 |w (DE-600)2169771-1 |w (DE-576)273875329 |x 1745-5243 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:3 |g year:2006 |g number:2 |g pages:135-157 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/1740468106065489 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://brill.com/view/journals/jmp/3/2/article-p135_2.xml |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4192066742 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1817473743 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220927053006 | ||
LOK | |0 008 220927||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-22#720549805E33EECCDA4147734335E32B83B2FC2C | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |