Crisp's ‘Ethics Without Reasons?’: A Note on Invariance
Abstract Crisp is right to detect a clash between Dancy's leading formulation of holism about reasons and the phenomenon of invariance. Replying to Crisp on behalf of the particularist, I suggest a better formulation of holism modelled on a standard treatment in the philosophy of language of co...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Brill
2007
|
Dans: |
Journal of moral philosophy
Année: 2007, Volume: 4, Numéro: 1, Pages: 50-54 |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Crisp
B Holism B Particularism B CONTEXT-SENSITIVITY B invariance B Dancy |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Résumé: | Abstract Crisp is right to detect a clash between Dancy's leading formulation of holism about reasons and the phenomenon of invariance. Replying to Crisp on behalf of the particularist, I suggest a better formulation of holism modelled on a standard treatment in the philosophy of language of context-sensitive expressions. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1745-5243 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal of moral philosophy
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/1740468106072784 |