Defending Defensive Killing: Reply to Barry, McMahan, Ferzan, Renzo, and Haque

This article responds to objections to the account of permissible harming developed in Defensive Killing, as raised by Christian Barry, Jeff McMahan, Kimberly Ferzan, Massimo Renzo and Adil Ahmad Haque. Each paper deserves much more attention than I can give it here. I focus on Barry’s important obs...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Frowe, Helen (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2018
In: Journal of moral philosophy
Year: 2018, Volume: 15, Issue: 6, Pages: 750-766
Further subjects:B Self-defence
B defensive harming
B permissible killing
B duties to rescue
B civilian immunity
B Just War Theory
B bloodless invasion
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 181747328X
003 DE-627
005 20220927053004.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220927s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/17455243-01506003  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)181747328X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP181747328X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Frowe, Helen  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Defending Defensive Killing: Reply to Barry, McMahan, Ferzan, Renzo, and Haque 
264 1 |c 2018 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article responds to objections to the account of permissible harming developed in Defensive Killing, as raised by Christian Barry, Jeff McMahan, Kimberly Ferzan, Massimo Renzo and Adil Ahmad Haque. Each paper deserves much more attention than I can give it here. I focus on Barry’s important observations regarding the liability to defensive harm of those who fail to rescue. In response to McMahan, I grant some of McMahan’s objections to my rejection of the moral equivalence of threats and bystanders, but reject his analysis of my Shield cases. I welcome much of Ferzan’s development of my account of ‘futile’ defence, but offer some concerns regarding her own view of when honour can be appropriately defended. I argue that Renzo’s objections to my account of bloodless invasions are unpersuasive, and identify some problems with Renzo’s own view. Finally, I defend my account of civilian liability against Adil Haque’s critique. 
650 4 |a duties to rescue 
650 4 |a civilian immunity 
650 4 |a Self-defence 
650 4 |a bloodless invasion 
650 4 |a permissible killing 
650 4 |a defensive harming 
650 4 |a Just War Theory 
650 4 |a duties to rescue 
650 4 |a civilian immunity 
650 4 |a Self-defence 
650 4 |a bloodless invasion 
650 4 |a permissible killing 
650 4 |a defensive harming 
650 4 |a Just War Theory 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of moral philosophy  |d Leiden : Brill, 2004  |g 15(2018), 6, Seite 750-766  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)474382281  |w (DE-600)2169771-1  |w (DE-576)273875329  |x 1745-5243  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:15  |g year:2018  |g number:6  |g pages:750-766 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-01506003  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/jmp/15/6/article-p750_750.xml  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 15  |j 2018  |e 6  |h 750-766 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4192066289 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 181747328X 
LOK |0 005 20220927053004 
LOK |0 008 220927||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-23#5961564C432D69A064005B1B3F0AE4081755C109 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw