Preferences’ Significance Does Not Depend on Their Content
Moral theories which include a preference-fulfillment aspect should not restrict their concern to some subset of people’s preferences such as “now-for-now” preferences. Instead, preferences with all contents—e.g. ones which are external, diachronic, or even modal—should be taken into account. I offe...
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
| Lingua: | Inglese |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Pubblicazione: |
2016
|
| In: |
Journal of moral philosophy
Anno: 2016, Volume: 13, Fascicolo: 2, Pagine: 211-234 |
| Altre parole chiave: | B
modal preferences
B preference fulfillment B posthumous harm B preference utilitarianism |
| Accesso online: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
