Can Wars Be Fought Justly? The Necessity Condition Put to the Test

Abstract According to a widespread view, the same constraints that limit the use of otherwise immoral measures in individual self-defense apply to collective self-defense too. I try to show that this view has radical implications at the level of jus in bello, implications which have not been fully a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Statman, Daniel (Verfasst von)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: 2011
In: Journal of moral philosophy
Jahr: 2011, Band: 8, Heft: 3, Seiten: 435-451
weitere Schlagwörter:B JUST WAR THEORY
B PROPORTIONALITY
B SELF-DEFENSE
B CONTRACTUALISM
Online-Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1817472127
003 DE-627
005 20241205202836.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220927s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/174552411X591357  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1817472127 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1817472127 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Statman, Daniel  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Can Wars Be Fought Justly? The Necessity Condition Put to the Test 
264 1 |c 2011 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Abstract According to a widespread view, the same constraints that limit the use of otherwise immoral measures in individual self-defense apply to collective self-defense too. I try to show that this view has radical implications at the level of jus in bello, implications which have not been fully appreciated. In particular, if the necessity condition must be satisfied in all cases of killing in war, then most fighting would turn out to be unjust. One way to avoid this result is to adopt a contractualist view of killing in war, a view which interprets the necessity condition in a way that is more permissive with regard to killing combatants in war. At least in this respect, a contractualist view of killing in war has an advantage over other candidates in explaining how wars might be fought justly. 
650 4 |a JUST WAR THEORY 
650 4 |a PROPORTIONALITY 
650 4 |a CONTRACTUALISM 
650 4 |a SELF-DEFENSE 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of moral philosophy  |d Leiden : Brill, 2004  |g 8(2011), 3, Seite 435-451  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)474382281  |w (DE-600)2169771-1  |w (DE-576)273875329  |x 1745-5243  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:8  |g year:2011  |g number:3  |g pages:435-451 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/174552411X591357  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/jmp/8/3/article-p435_9.xml  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4192065126 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1817472127 
LOK |0 005 20220927053000 
LOK |0 008 220927||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-22#551D6FB9191350D66520657ACB7B61607BC5313A 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw