The Origin and Future of Political Liberalism
This essay reviews Paul Weithman’s new work – Why Political Liberalism? On John Rawls’s Political Turn. Weithman’s book has two aims, first to explain why Rawls recast his political theory and second, to defend a particular interpretation of political liberalism. In contrast to other reviews, this e...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2014
|
| In: |
Journal of moral philosophy
Year: 2014, Volume: 11, Issue: 5, Pages: 639-656 |
| Further subjects: | B
reasonable pluralism
B John Rawls B Stability B public reason B Political Liberalism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1817471503 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220927052958.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220927s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/17455243-01105001 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1817471503 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1817471503 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Vallier, Kevin |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Origin and Future of Political Liberalism |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2014 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This essay reviews Paul Weithman’s new work – Why Political Liberalism? On John Rawls’s Political Turn. Weithman’s book has two aims, first to explain why Rawls recast his political theory and second, to defend a particular interpretation of political liberalism. In contrast to other reviews, this essay addresses the latter aim. I challenge Weithman’s defense of political liberalism on two grounds: (1) that it fails to adequately grapple with pluralism about justice and (2) that it does not provide an adequate model of stability for the right reasons. I conclude that these two weaknesses in an otherwise excellent book suggest a promising future for the political liberal tradition, one that is more comfortable with indeterminacy and less comfortable with deliberative restraint. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a reasonable pluralism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Stability | |
| 650 | 4 | |a public reason | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Political Liberalism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a John Rawls | |
| 650 | 4 | |a reasonable pluralism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Stability | |
| 650 | 4 | |a public reason | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Political Liberalism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a John Rawls | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of moral philosophy |d Leiden : Brill, 2004 |g 11(2014), 5, Seite 639-656 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)474382281 |w (DE-600)2169771-1 |w (DE-576)273875329 |x 1745-5243 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:11 |g year:2014 |g number:5 |g pages:639-656 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-01105001 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://brill.com/view/journals/jmp/11/5/article-p639_5.xml |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4192064502 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1817471503 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220927052958 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220927||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-22#EE6D406B68C61FD3617D63264362A9FAEF7814A2 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||