Can Minimal Autonomy Legitimate Coercive Institutions?

The central thesis of Hassoun’s book states that coercive international institutions, in order to be legitimate, must ensure sufficient autonomy for those subject to them. While part i analyses the theoretical structure of this argument, part ii aims to assess its practical implications in the conte...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dietsch, Peter (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2016
In: Journal of moral philosophy
Year: 2016, Volume: 13, Issue: 2, Pages: 235-244
Further subjects:B Global Justice
B Sufficientarianism
B International institutions
B Autonomy
B Legitimacy
B Fair Trade
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 181747071X
003 DE-627
005 20230426141037.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220927s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/17455243-01302006  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)181747071X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP181747071X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Dietsch, Peter  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Dietsch, Peter 
245 1 0 |a Can Minimal Autonomy Legitimate Coercive Institutions? 
264 1 |c 2016 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The central thesis of Hassoun’s book states that coercive international institutions, in order to be legitimate, must ensure sufficient autonomy for those subject to them. While part i analyses the theoretical structure of this argument, part ii aims to assess its practical implications in the contexts of aid and trade. This effort to bridge the gap between theory and practice is welcome, even though the connection could be strengthened further. At the core of Hassoun’s theoretical stance lies the innovative idea of a sufficientarian account of the legitimacy of coercive institutions. This review suggests that, in contrast to a sufficientarian theory of the just distribution of material resources, relying on a sufficientarian view in the context of legitimacy is more controversial. Following the discussion of some more specific theoretical issues, the review closes with an evaluation of Hassoun’s proposal of a fair trade certification system for pharmaceutical companies. 
601 |a Autonomie 
601 |a Legitimation 
601 |a Institution 
650 4 |a Fair Trade 
650 4 |a Sufficientarianism 
650 4 |a Autonomy 
650 4 |a Legitimacy 
650 4 |a International institutions 
650 4 |a Global Justice 
650 4 |a Fair Trade 
650 4 |a Sufficientarianism 
650 4 |a Autonomy 
650 4 |a Legitimacy 
650 4 |a International institutions 
650 4 |a Global Justice 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of moral philosophy  |d Leiden : Brill, 2004  |g 13(2016), 2, Seite 235-244  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)474382281  |w (DE-600)2169771-1  |w (DE-576)273875329  |x 1745-5243  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:13  |g year:2016  |g number:2  |g pages:235-244 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-01302006  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/jmp/13/2/article-p235_5.xml  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 13  |j 2016  |e 2  |h 235-244 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4192063719 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 181747071X 
LOK |0 005 20220927052955 
LOK |0 008 220927||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-22#6D1E4775E827A22B315FB20DF859666E83603246 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw