The Failure of Hooker’s Argument for Rule Consequentialism
Brad Hooker argues for rule consequentialism using narrow reflective equilibrium resources along with a handful of wider resources. One of his important claims in defense of rule consequentialism is that it begins from a familiar and attractive idea about morality. I argue that his defense of rule c...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2014
|
| In: |
Journal of moral philosophy
Year: 2014, Volume: 11, Issue: 5, Pages: 598-614 |
| Further subjects: | B
Rule Utilitarianism
B Utilitarianism B Moral Theory B Hooker B rule consequentialism B Consequentialism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1817470663 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20241205202828.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220927s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/17455243-4681014 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1817470663 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1817470663 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Levy, Sanford |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Failure of Hooker’s Argument for Rule Consequentialism |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2014 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Brad Hooker argues for rule consequentialism using narrow reflective equilibrium resources along with a handful of wider resources. One of his important claims in defense of rule consequentialism is that it begins from a familiar and attractive idea about morality. I argue that his defense of rule consequentialism fails and more particularly, that rather than beginning from a familiar and attractive idea, it begins from an idea that is quite unattractive. I show this by applying the method rule consequentialists use to derive moral advice for the real world to non-moral cases where its unattractiveness is clear. I then argue that the basic idea behind rule consequentialism is attractive if considered as an account of moral reform, in so far as the account of moral reform can be divorced from one’s account of right and wrong, something that occurs in theories like that of Stephen Toulmin. | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Moral Theory | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Utilitarianism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Rule Utilitarianism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a rule consequentialism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Hooker | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Consequentialism | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of moral philosophy |d Leiden : Brill, 2004 |g 11(2014), 5, Seite 598-614 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)474382281 |w (DE-600)2169771-1 |w (DE-576)273875329 |x 1745-5243 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:11 |g year:2014 |g number:5 |g pages:598-614 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-4681014 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://brill.com/view/journals/jmp/11/5/article-p598_3.xml |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4192063662 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1817470663 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220927052955 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220927||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-22#01DFD2BA4A346FC45CD45F4FD77DB2806B7CCD9D | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
