Participation and Superfluity

Why act when the effects of one’s act are negligible? For example, why boycott sweatshop or animal products if doing so makes no difference for the better? According to recent proposals, one may still have a reason to boycott in order to avoid complicity or participation in harm. Julia Nefsky has ar...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Wieland, Jan Willem (Author) ; Oeveren, Rutger van (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2020
In: Journal of moral philosophy
Year: 2020, Volume: 17, Issue: 2, Pages: 163-187
Further subjects:B Collective Action
B Participation
B Complicity
B Membership
B superfluity
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1817470612
003 DE-627
005 20220927052955.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220927s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/17455243-01702002  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1817470612 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1817470612 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Wieland, Jan Willem  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Participation and Superfluity 
264 1 |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Why act when the effects of one’s act are negligible? For example, why boycott sweatshop or animal products if doing so makes no difference for the better? According to recent proposals, one may still have a reason to boycott in order to avoid complicity or participation in harm. Julia Nefsky has argued that accounts of this kind suffer from the so-called “superfluity problem,” basically the question of why agents can be said to participate in harm if they make no difference to it. This paper develops and responds to Nefsky’s challenge. 
650 4 |a superfluity 
650 4 |a Collective Action 
650 4 |a Complicity 
650 4 |a Membership 
650 4 |a Participation 
650 4 |a superfluity 
650 4 |a Collective Action 
650 4 |a Complicity 
650 4 |a Membership 
650 4 |a Participation 
700 1 |a Oeveren, Rutger van  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of moral philosophy  |d Leiden : Brill, 2004  |g 17(2020), 2, Seite 163-187  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)474382281  |w (DE-600)2169771-1  |w (DE-576)273875329  |x 1745-5243  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:17  |g year:2020  |g number:2  |g pages:163-187 
856 |u https://brill.com/downloadpdf/journals/jmp/17/2/article-p163_163.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via page says license)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-01702002  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/jmp/17/2/article-p163_163.xml  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4192063611 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1817470612 
LOK |0 005 20220927052955 
LOK |0 008 220927||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-23#BD626FD88DF31EA12D030F1A9349147E85EAD25E 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw