In Defense of a Category-Based System for Unification Admissions
Liberal societies typically prefer relatives and spouses of their members over other prospective immigrants seeking admission. Giving this preferential treatment to only certain categories of relationships requires justification. In this paper, I provide a defense of a category-based system for “uni...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2018
|
| In: |
Journal of moral philosophy
Year: 2018, Volume: 15, Issue: 5, Pages: 572-598 |
| Further subjects: | B
Ethics
B admissions categories B Immigration B Neutrality B Family |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 181746941X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20241205202822.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220927s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/17455243-20180005 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)181746941X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP181746941X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Lindauer, Matthew |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a In Defense of a Category-Based System for Unification Admissions |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Liberal societies typically prefer relatives and spouses of their members over other prospective immigrants seeking admission. Giving this preferential treatment to only certain categories of relationships requires justification. In this paper, I provide a defense of a category-based system for “unification admissions,” non-members seeking admission for the purpose of living in the same society with members on a stable basis, that is compatible with liberalism and, in particular, does not violate the requirement of liberal neutrality. This defense does not commit liberal theorists to the traditional state sovereignty view on immigration, according to which societies have wide latitude to exclude immigrants as they see fit, and shows that, contra Ferracioli, societies are not required to treat relatives, spouses, friends, and creative partners of their members on a par in matters of immigration policy. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Neutrality | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Immigration | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Family | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a admissions categories | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of moral philosophy |d Leiden : Brill, 2004 |g 15(2018), 5, Seite 572-598 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)474382281 |w (DE-600)2169771-1 |w (DE-576)273875329 |x 1745-5243 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:15 |g year:2018 |g number:5 |g pages:572-598 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-20180005 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |7 1 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://brill.com/view/journals/jmp/15/5/article-p572_572.xml |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |7 1 |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4192062410 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 181746941X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220927052950 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220927||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-23#AC394384E3D06E87992CC927213211E9AD7AF350 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| LOK | |0 939 |a 27-09-22 |b l01 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a The Ethics |
