The Fact of Diversity and Reasonable Pluralism

Abstract Contemporary society involves a number of different persons, groups, and ways of life that are deeply divided and very often opposed on fundamental matters of deep concern. Today, many contemporary philosophers regard this 'fact of diversity' as a problem that needs to be addresse...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lynch, Sterling (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2009
In: Journal of moral philosophy
Year: 2009, Volume: 6, Issue: 1, Pages: 70-93
Further subjects:B Pluralism
B STABILITY
B CIVIC EDUCATION
B Diversity
B RAWLS
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1817469223
003 DE-627
005 20220927052949.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220927s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/174552409X365937  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1817469223 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1817469223 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Lynch, Sterling  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Fact of Diversity and Reasonable Pluralism 
264 1 |c 2009 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Abstract Contemporary society involves a number of different persons, groups, and ways of life that are deeply divided and very often opposed on fundamental matters of deep concern. Today, many contemporary philosophers regard this 'fact of diversity' as a problem that needs to be addressed when assessing the principles employed to organize society. In this paper, I discuss the fact of diversity, as it is understood by the notion of reasonable pluralism, and explain why it is thought by some to challenge the stability of a society's political morality. I examine the leading attempt to offer an account of the stability of a political morality and I argue that John Rawls's attempt to account for the stability of Justice as Fairness fails for reasons applicable to all political moralities because the very notion of a stable political morality is implausible. Diversity, as reasonable pluralism understands it, is not a problem that can be solved either by identifying a stable political morality or by modifying a political morality in some way that will make it more stable. Instead, the fact of diversity indicates only that disagreements on all aspects of society's organization, including its organizing principles and matters of value, is a permanent feature of social life that cannot be ignored, wished away, or solved. 
650 4 |a Diversity 
650 4 |a STABILITY 
650 4 |a Pluralism 
650 4 |a CIVIC EDUCATION 
650 4 |a RAWLS 
650 4 |a Diversity 
650 4 |a STABILITY 
650 4 |a Pluralism 
650 4 |a CIVIC EDUCATION 
650 4 |a RAWLS 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of moral philosophy  |d Leiden : Brill, 2004  |g 6(2009), 1, Seite 70-93  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)474382281  |w (DE-600)2169771-1  |w (DE-576)273875329  |x 1745-5243  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:6  |g year:2009  |g number:1  |g pages:70-93 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/174552409X365937  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/jmp/6/1/article-p70_6.xml  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 6  |j 2009  |e 1  |h 70-93 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4192062224 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1817469223 
LOK |0 005 20220927052949 
LOK |0 008 220927||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-22#E049B4836B9EBCEC5ADE7C1243C4DB0350A1040D 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw