RT Article
T1 Der Zweifel an Regierungsmaßnahmen als Sakrileg: römisches und kanonisches Recht bei der Ausbildung des päpstlichen und fürstlichen Absolutismus
JF Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie
VO 118
IS 2
SP 126
OP 137
A1 Hageneder, Othmar 1927-2020
A2 Mühlsteiger, Johannes 1926-2020
LA German
YR 1996
UL https://ixtheo.de/Record/1817360558
AB The study offers examples of the tradition of the statement originated in Cod. 9. 29. 2(3) "Disputari de principali iudicio non oportet: sacrilegii enim instar est dubitare, an is dignus sit, quem elegerit imperator" in the Ius commune of the higher and later Middle Ages, from the Decretum Gratiani over decretists and decretalists to commentators and legists of the 14th and 15th century. The author also refers to the using by popes, especially Innocent III., to the acceptance of this argument within christianity during the 12th and 13th century, and to documents of civil law from the Assises of Ariano of King Roger II. of Sicily to various statements of absolutistic sovereigns and their functionaries of the 17th century. The theme could be given a deeper treatment.
K1 Papst
K1 Kanonisches Recht
K1 Römisches Recht
K1 Absolutismus
K1 Kaiser
K1 Verhältnis Staat-Kirche
K1 Mittelalter
K1 Neuzeit
K1 Dekretalen
K1 Innocenz III
K1 Dekretalisten
K1 Dekretisten
K1 Gratianisches Dekret/Decretum gratiani
K1 church-state relations
K1 Middle Ages
K1 Modern Era
K1 Decretals
K1 Innocent III
K1 Decretalists
K1 Decretists
K1 Gratian's Decree/Decretum gratiani
K1 Festschrift