Epistemic injustice in psychiatric practice: epistemic duties and the phenomenological approach
Epistemic injustice is a kind of injustice that arises when one’s capacity as an epistemic subject (eg, a knower, a reasoner) is wrongfully denied. In recent years it has been argued that psychiatric patients are often harmed in their capacity as knowers and suffer from various forms of epistemic in...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
BMJ Publ.
2021
|
In: |
Journal of medical ethics
Year: 2021, Volume: 47, Issue: 12 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1816167088 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230426125631.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220908s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1136/medethics-2020-106679 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1816167088 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1816167088 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Drożdżowicz, Anna |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Epistemic injustice in psychiatric practice: epistemic duties and the phenomenological approach |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Epistemic injustice is a kind of injustice that arises when one’s capacity as an epistemic subject (eg, a knower, a reasoner) is wrongfully denied. In recent years it has been argued that psychiatric patients are often harmed in their capacity as knowers and suffer from various forms of epistemic injustice that they encounter in psychiatric services. Acknowledging that epistemic injustice is a multifaceted problem in psychiatry calls for an adequate response. In this paper I argue that, given that psychiatric patients deserve epistemic respect and have a certain epistemic privilege, healthcare professionals have a pro tanto epistemic duty to attend to and/or solicit reports of patients’ first-person experiences in order to prevent epistemic losses. I discuss the nature and scope of this epistemic duty and point to one interesting consequence. In order to prevent epistemic losses, healthcare professionals may need to provide some patients with resources and tools for expressing their experiences and first-person knowledge, such as those that have been developed within the phenomenological approach. I discuss the risk of secondary testimonial and hermeneutical injustice that the practice of relying on such external tools might pose and survey some ways to mitigate it. | ||
601 | |a Episteme | ||
601 | |a Psychiatrie | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of medical ethics |d London : BMJ Publ., 1975 |g 47(2021), 12, Artikel-ID 69 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)323607802 |w (DE-600)2026397-1 |w (DE-576)260773972 |x 1473-4257 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:47 |g year:2021 |g number:12 |g elocationid:69 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106679 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://jme.bmj.com/content/47/12/e69.abstract |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
936 | u | w | |d 47 |j 2021 |e 12 |i 69 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4185621035 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1816167088 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220908053815 | ||
LOK | |0 008 220908||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-08-03#CBCA5C392CA9AAD8D8CECA9B11827E1621136344 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
OAS | |a 1 |b inherited from superior work | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |