Substituted decision making and the dispositional choice account
There are two main ways of understanding the function of surrogate decision making in a legal context: the Best Interests Standard and the Substituted Judgment Standard. First, we will argue that the Best Interests Standard is difficult to apply to unconscious patients. Application is difficult rega...
Authors: | ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
BMJ Publ.
2018
|
In: |
Journal of medical ethics
Year: 2018, Volume: 44, Issue: 10, Pages: 703-709 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1816158747 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230428063504.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220908s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1136/medethics-2016-103672 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1816158747 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1816158747 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Andersson, Anna-Karin Margareta |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Substituted decision making and the dispositional choice account |
264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a There are two main ways of understanding the function of surrogate decision making in a legal context: the Best Interests Standard and the Substituted Judgment Standard. First, we will argue that the Best Interests Standard is difficult to apply to unconscious patients. Application is difficult regardless of whether they have ever been conscious. Second, we will argue that if we accept the least problematic explanation of how unconscious patients can have interests, we are also obliged to accept that the Substituted Judgment Standard can be coherently applied to patients who have never been conscious at the same extent as the Best Interests Standard. We then argue that acknowledging this result is important in order to show patients respect. | ||
601 | |a Substitution | ||
601 | |a Disposition | ||
700 | 1 | |a Johansson, Kjell Arne |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of medical ethics |d London : BMJ Publ., 1975 |g 44(2018), 10, Seite 703-709 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)323607802 |w (DE-600)2026397-1 |w (DE-576)260773972 |x 1473-4257 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:44 |g year:2018 |g number:10 |g pages:703-709 |
856 | |u https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/44/10/703.full.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2016-103672 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://jme.bmj.com/content/44/10/703.1.abstract |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
936 | u | w | |d 44 |j 2018 |e 10 |h 703-709 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4185612680 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1816158747 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220908053727 | ||
LOK | |0 008 220908||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-08-03#9672750B96EA20397655F29380C482E05432DD83 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |