Ethical arguments for access to abortion services in the Republic of Ireland: recent developments in the public discourse
The Republic of Ireland has some of the most restrictive abortion legislation in the world which grants to the ‘unborn’ an equal right to life to that of the pregnant woman. This article outlines recent developments in the public discourse on abortion in Ireland and explains the particular cultural...
Authors: | ; ; ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
BMJ Publ.
2018
|
In: |
Journal of medical ethics
Year: 2018, Volume: 44, Issue: 8, Pages: 513-517 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1816158259 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230428063501.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220908s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1136/medethics-2017-104728 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1816158259 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1816158259 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a McCarthy, Joan |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Ethical arguments for access to abortion services in the Republic of Ireland: recent developments in the public discourse |
264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The Republic of Ireland has some of the most restrictive abortion legislation in the world which grants to the ‘unborn’ an equal right to life to that of the pregnant woman. This article outlines recent developments in the public discourse on abortion in Ireland and explains the particular cultural and religious context that informs the ethical case for access to abortion services. Our perspective rests on respect for two very familiar moral principles - autonomy and justice - which are at the centre of social and democratic societies around the world. This article explains the context for the deployment of these concepts in order to support the claim that the current legislation and its operationalisation in clinical practice poses serious risks to the health, lives and well-being of pregnant women, tramples on their autonomy rights and requires of them a self-sacrifice that is unreasonable and unjust. | ||
601 | |a Argumentation | ||
700 | 1 | |a O’Donnell, Katherine |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Campbell, Louise |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Dooley, Dolores |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of medical ethics |d London : BMJ Publ., 1975 |g 44(2018), 8, Seite 513-517 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)323607802 |w (DE-600)2026397-1 |w (DE-576)260773972 |x 1473-4257 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:44 |g year:2018 |g number:8 |g pages:513-517 |
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/26879780 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2017-104728 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://jme.bmj.com/content/44/8/513.abstract |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
936 | u | w | |d 44 |j 2018 |e 8 |h 513-517 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4185612192 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1816158259 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220908053724 | ||
LOK | |0 008 220908||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-08-03#D4306AB470B4CE06E00A5F60A9B2A03B9C3DD6F2 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/26879780 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
OAS | |a 1 |b inherited from superior work | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |