Ethics briefing

In April 2017, the Court of Appeal allowed a challenge to the UK law on assisted dying to proceed.Noel Conway was diagnosed with motor neuron disease in 2014. His condition is incurable and he is not expected to live beyond 12 months. He wishes to enlist the assistance of a medical professional to e...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Brannan, Sophie (Author) ; Campbell, Ruth (Author) ; Davies, Martin (Author) ; English, Veronica (Author) ; Mussell, Rebecca (Author) ; Sheather, Julian (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: BMJ Publ. 2017
In: Journal of medical ethics
Year: 2017, Volume: 43, Issue: 8, Pages: 571-573
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 181615623X
003 DE-627
005 20230426115902.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220908s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1136/medethics-2017-104337  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)181615623X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP181615623X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Brannan, Sophie  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Ethics briefing 
264 1 |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In April 2017, the Court of Appeal allowed a challenge to the UK law on assisted dying to proceed.Noel Conway was diagnosed with motor neuron disease in 2014. His condition is incurable and he is not expected to live beyond 12 months. He wishes to enlist the assistance of a medical professional to end his life at a time of his choosing and seeks a declaration that the prohibition on assisted dying under the UK law is incompatible with his rights under Article 8 (the right to respect for private and family life) and Article 14 (the right to freedom from discrimination) as protected by the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).1 Previous Ethics briefings reported on the case of Tony Nicklinson, a man with locked-in syndrome who brought a similar claim which failed in the Supreme Court in 2014.2 The Supreme Court declined to make a declaration of incompatibility between the law and Mr Nicklinson's rights under the ECHR, and held that, in light of the ‘fundamental but mutually inconsistent moral values’ involved, agreeing a legal position on assisted dying was for Parliament to decide.3 A key component of their reasoning was the fact that Lord Falconer's Assisted Dying Bill was then under parliamentary consideration, and was due to have its second reading in the House of Lords.4 The Court reserved the right to make a future declaration of incompatibility if Parliament failed to address the issue, stating that Parliament must act in the knowledge that ‘if it is not satisfactorily addressed, there is a real prospect that a further, and successful, application for a declaration of incompatibility may be made’.5 The key question for the Court in Conway was therefore whether the circumstances which led the Supreme Court to refuse to consider a … 
700 1 |a Campbell, Ruth  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Davies, Martin  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a English, Veronica  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Mussell, Rebecca  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Sheather, Julian  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of medical ethics  |d London : BMJ Publ., 1975  |g 43(2017), 8, Seite 571-573  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)323607802  |w (DE-600)2026397-1  |w (DE-576)260773972  |x 1473-4257  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:43  |g year:2017  |g number:8  |g pages:571-573 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/44606628  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2017-104337  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u http://jme.bmj.com/content/43/8/571.abstract  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4185610173 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 181615623X 
LOK |0 005 20220908053712 
LOK |0 008 220908||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-08-03#816E4F496F8669EE9B2C6EB1B5B3D083F51BFD1A 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/44606628 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw