Results of a self-assessment tool to assess the operational characteristics of research ethics committees in low- and middle-income countries

Purpose Many research ethics committees (RECs) have been established in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in response to increased research in these countries. How well these RECs are functioning remains largely unknown. Our objective was to assess the usefulness of a self-assessment tool in...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Silverman, Henry (Author) ; Sleem, Hany (Author) ; Moodley, Keymanthri (Author) ; Kumar, Nandini (Author) ; Naidoo, Sudeshni (Author) ; Subramanian, Thilakavathi (Author) ; Jaafar, Rola (Author) ; Moni, Malini (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: BMJ Publ. 2015
In: Journal of medical ethics
Year: 2015, Volume: 41, Issue: 4, Pages: 332-337
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1816150789
003 DE-627
005 20230426115820.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220908s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1136/medethics-2013-101587  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1816150789 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1816150789 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Silverman, Henry  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Silverman, Henry 
245 1 0 |a Results of a self-assessment tool to assess the operational characteristics of research ethics committees in low- and middle-income countries 
264 1 |c 2015 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Purpose Many research ethics committees (RECs) have been established in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in response to increased research in these countries. How well these RECs are functioning remains largely unknown. Our objective was to assess the usefulness of a self-assessment tool in obtaining benchmarking data on the extent to which RECs are in compliance with recognised international standards. Methods REC chairs from several LMICs (Egypt, South Africa and India) were asked to complete an online self-assessment tool for RECs with a maximum score of 200. Individual responses were collected anonymously. Results The aggregate mean score was 137.4±35.8 (∼70% of maximum score); mean scores were significantly associated with the presence of a budget (p<0.001), but not with duration of existence, frequency of meetings, or the presence of national guidelines. As a group, RECs achieved more than 80% of the maximum score for the following domains: submission processes and documents received, recording of meeting minutes, criteria for ethical review and criteria for informed consent. RECs achieved less than 80% of the maximum score for the following domains: institutional commitment, policies and procedures of the REC, membership composition and training, policies and procedures for protocol review, elements of a decision letter and criteria for continuing review. Conclusions This study highlights areas where RECs from LMICs can improve to be in compliance with recommended international standards for RECs. The self-assessment tool provides valuable benchmarking data for RECs and can serve as a quality improvement method to help RECs enhance their operations. 
700 1 |a Sleem, Hany  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Moodley, Keymanthri  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Kumar, Nandini  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Naidoo, Sudeshni  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Subramanian, Thilakavathi  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Jaafar, Rola  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Moni, Malini  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of medical ethics  |d London : BMJ Publ., 1975  |g 41(2015), 4, Seite 332-337  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)323607802  |w (DE-600)2026397-1  |w (DE-576)260773972  |x 1473-4257  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:41  |g year:2015  |g number:4  |g pages:332-337 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/44014058  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2013-101587  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u http://jme.bmj.com/content/41/4/332.abstract  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4185604696 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1816150789 
LOK |0 005 20220908053638 
LOK |0 008 220908||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-08-03#BADAAB7980D0D368EBD29D7797CEE03566D81A83 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/44014058 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw