Honorary authorship in biomedical journals: how common is it and why does it exist?

Background The number of coauthors in the medical literature has increased over the past 50 years as authorship continues to have important academic, social and financial implications. Aim and method The study aim was to determine the prevalence of honorary authorship in biomedical publications and...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Αποθηκεύτηκε σε:  
Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Κύριοι συγγραφείς: Al-Herz, Waleed (Συγγραφέας) ; Haider, Hani (Συγγραφέας) ; Al-Bahhar, Mahmoud (Συγγραφέας) ; Sadeq, Adnan (Συγγραφέας)
Τύπος μέσου: Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο
Γλώσσα:Αγγλικά
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Έκδοση: 2014
Στο/Στη: Journal of medical ethics
Έτος: 2014, Τόμος: 40, Τεύχος: 5, Σελίδες: 346-348
Διαθέσιμο Online: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1816148180
003 DE-627
005 20230426115756.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220908s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1136/medethics-2012-101311  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1816148180 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1816148180 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Al-Herz, Waleed  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Honorary authorship in biomedical journals: how common is it and why does it exist? 
264 1 |c 2014 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Background The number of coauthors in the medical literature has increased over the past 50 years as authorship continues to have important academic, social and financial implications. Aim and method The study aim was to determine the prevalence of honorary authorship in biomedical publications and identify the factors that lead to its existence. An email with a survey link was sent anonymously to 9283 corresponding authors of PubMed articles published within 1 year of contact. Results A completed survey was obtained from 1246 corresponding authors, a response rate of 15.75%. One-third (33.4%) admitted that they had added authors who did not deserve authorship credit. Origin of the study from Europe and Asia (p ≤ 0.001 and 0.005, respectively), study type as case report/case series (p=0.036) and increasing number of coauthors were found to be the associated factors on multivariate analysis. Journal impact factor was also found to be associated with honorary authorship (mean journal impact factor was 4.82 (SD 6.32) for those who self-reported honorary authorship and 5.60 (SD 7.13) for those who did not report unjust authorship, p=0.05). In retrospect, 75% of the authors indicated that they would remove unjustified names from the authorship list. Reasons for adding honorary authors were complimentary (39.4%), to avoid conflict at work (16.1%), to facilitate article acceptance (7.2%), and other (3.6%). Conclusions Honorary authorship is relatively common in biomedical publications. Researchers should comply with the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors’ criteria for authorship. 
700 1 |a Haider, Hani  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Al-Bahhar, Mahmoud  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Sadeq, Adnan  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of medical ethics  |d London : BMJ Publ., 1975  |g 40(2014), 5, Seite 346-348  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)323607802  |w (DE-600)2026397-1  |w (DE-576)260773972  |x 1473-4257  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:40  |g year:2014  |g number:5  |g pages:346-348 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/43283001  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-101311  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
856 4 0 |u http://jme.bmj.com/content/40/5/346.abstract  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4185602081 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1816148180 
LOK |0 005 20220908053622 
LOK |0 008 220908||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-08-03#B58DC1498970B8C7184BA1315EF6C95C6A15C685 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/43283001 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
LOK |0 939   |a 08-09-22  |b l01 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw