Ethics briefing

On 25 January 2013, the UK Government announced that it had decided against abolishing the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) and Human Tissue Authority (HTA) as it had originally announced in 2010.1 This was the second aborted attempt to change the UK's regulatory mechanism fo...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Davies, Martin (Author) ; Brannan, Sophie (Author) ; Chrispin, Eleanor (Author) ; English, Veronica (Author) ; Mussell, Rebecca (Author) ; Sheather, C. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: BMJ Publ. 2013
In: Journal of medical ethics
Year: 2013, Volume: 39, Issue: 6, Pages: 413-414
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 181614620X
003 DE-627
005 20230427161314.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220908s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1136/medethics-2013-101515  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)181614620X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP181614620X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Davies, Martin  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Ethics briefing 
264 1 |c 2013 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a On 25 January 2013, the UK Government announced that it had decided against abolishing the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) and Human Tissue Authority (HTA) as it had originally announced in 2010.1 This was the second aborted attempt to change the UK's regulatory mechanism for human embryos and tissues in less than a decade. In 2005, the Government had announced that it planned to merge the two bodies to form a Regulatory Authority for Tissue and Embryos (RATE),2 only to reverse its decision two years later. On both occasions, the Government spent two years trying to persuade people of the benefit of its proposals, only to be persuaded itself by the contrary arguments. In 2010, the coalition Government came to power promising to unleash ‘a bonfire of the quangos’ (public bodies, also referred to as ‘arms length bodies’). Among the 192 organisations highlighted for abolition were the HFEA and the HTA. The plan was to have one regulator for clinical practice (the Care Quality Commission (CQC)), and one for research (the Health Research Authority (HRA); the functions of the HFEA and HTA would be split between those two bodies, with some tasks transferred elsewhere, and the two bodies would be abolished. The Government passed wide-ranging legislation—the Public Bodies Act 2011—giving it the power to modify or abolish the organisations listed by secondary legislation. While on paper this may have appeared a sensible solution, as in 2007, the practical implications and the risks of such a change soon became apparent. The CQC, which was to have taken on many of the functions, had itself been castigated for high-profile failings in its regulation of health and social care establishments. The Public Accounts Committee, for example, had concluded that the CQC had ‘failed to fulfil its core role effectively’ and … 
700 1 |a Brannan, Sophie  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Chrispin, Eleanor  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a English, Veronica  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Mussell, Rebecca  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Sheather, C.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of medical ethics  |d London : BMJ Publ., 1975  |g 39(2013), 6, Seite 413-414  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)323607802  |w (DE-600)2026397-1  |w (DE-576)260773972  |x 1473-4257  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:39  |g year:2013  |g number:6  |g pages:413-414 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/43282771  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2013-101515  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u http://jme.bmj.com/content/39/6/413.abstract  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4185600100 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 181614620X 
LOK |0 005 20220908053612 
LOK |0 008 220908||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-08-03#1C269417B12C39BA80B26DCAC85D6109A91959CF 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/43282771 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw