Ethics, organ donation and tax: a proposal
Five arguments are presented in favour of the proposal that people who opt in as organ donors should receive a tax break. These arguments appeal to welfare, autonomy, fairness, distributive justice and self-ownership, respectively. Eight worries about the proposal are considered in this paper. These...
Authors: | ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
BMJ Publ.
2012
|
In: |
Journal of medical ethics
Year: 2012, Volume: 38, Issue: 8, Pages: 451-457 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1816143952 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230427161306.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220908s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1136/medethics-2011-100163 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1816143952 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1816143952 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Søbirk Petersen, Thomas |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Ethics, organ donation and tax: a proposal |
264 | 1 | |c 2012 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Five arguments are presented in favour of the proposal that people who opt in as organ donors should receive a tax break. These arguments appeal to welfare, autonomy, fairness, distributive justice and self-ownership, respectively. Eight worries about the proposal are considered in this paper. These objections focus upon no-effect and counter-productiveness, the Titmuss concern about social meaning, exploitation of the poor, commodification, inequality and unequal status, the notion that there are better alternatives, unacceptable expense, and concerns about the veto of relatives. The paper argues that none of the objections to the proposal is very telling. | ||
700 | 1 | |a Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of medical ethics |d London : BMJ Publ., 1975 |g 38(2012), 8, Seite 451-457 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)323607802 |w (DE-600)2026397-1 |w (DE-576)260773972 |x 1473-4257 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:38 |g year:2012 |g number:8 |g pages:451-457 |
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/23273302 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | |u https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/38/8/451.full.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2011-100163 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://jme.bmj.com/content/38/8/451.abstract |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4185597843 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1816143952 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220908053556 | ||
LOK | |0 008 220908||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-08-03#187C65B41DC9B581F0F39682E3623A47BAE43FFE | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/23273302 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |