Ethics in systematic reviews

Since its introduction by the Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki, the place held by ethics in biomedical research has been continuously increasing in importance. The past 30 years have also seen exponential growth in the number of biomedical articles published. A systematic review of the...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Vergnes, Jean-Noel (Author) ; Marchal-Sixou, Christine (Author) ; Nabet, Cathy (Author) ; Maret, Delphine (Author) ; Hamel, Olivier (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: BMJ Publ. 2010
In: Journal of medical ethics
Year: 2010, Volume: 36, Issue: 12, Pages: 771-774
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1816140406
003 DE-627
005 20230427161254.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220908s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1136/jme.2010.039941  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1816140406 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1816140406 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Vergnes, Jean-Noel  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Ethics in systematic reviews 
264 1 |c 2010 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Since its introduction by the Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki, the place held by ethics in biomedical research has been continuously increasing in importance. The past 30 years have also seen exponential growth in the number of biomedical articles published. A systematic review of the literature is the scientific way of synthesising a plethora of information, by exhaustively searching out and objectively analysing the studies dealing with a given issue. However, the question of ethics in systematic reviews is rarely touched upon. This could lead to some drawbacks, as systematic reviews may contain studies with ethical insufficiencies, may be a possible way to publish unethical research and may also be prone to conflict of interest. Finally, informed consent given for an original study is not necessarily still valid at the systematic review level. There is no doubt that routine ethical assessment in systematic reviews would help to improve the ethical and methodological quality of studies in general. However, ethical issues change so much with time and location, and are so broad in scope and in context that it appears illusory to search for a universal, internationally accepted standard for ethical assessment in systematic reviews. Some simple suggestions could nevertheless be drawn from the present reflection and are discussed in the paper. 
601 |a Systematik 
700 1 |a Marchal-Sixou, Christine  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Nabet, Cathy  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Maret, Delphine  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Hamel, Olivier  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of medical ethics  |d London : BMJ Publ., 1975  |g 36(2010), 12, Seite 771-774  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)323607802  |w (DE-600)2026397-1  |w (DE-576)260773972  |x 1473-4257  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:36  |g year:2010  |g number:12  |g pages:771-774 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/25764315  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2010.039941  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u http://jme.bmj.com/content/36/12/771.abstract  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 36  |j 2010  |e 12  |h 771-774 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4185594283 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1816140406 
LOK |0 005 20220908053527 
LOK |0 008 220908||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-08-02#6429C03A2CE3F32D735ECC9DEF3832F499805E2C 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/25764315 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw