Opinions of private medical practitioners in Bloemfontein, South Africa, regarding euthanasia of terminally ill patients

The aim of this study was to determine the opinions of private medical practitioners in Bloemfontein, South Africa, regarding euthanasia of terminally ill patients. This descriptive study was performed amongst a simple random sample of 100 of 230 private medical practitioners in Bloemfontein. Inform...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Brits, L. (Author) ; Human, L. (Author) ; Pieterse, L. (Author) ; Sonnekus, P. (Author) ; Joubert, G. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: BMJ Publ. 2009
In: Journal of medical ethics
Year: 2009, Volume: 35, Issue: 3, Pages: 180-182
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1816136816
003 DE-627
005 20230427161242.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220908s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1136/jme.2008.027417  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1816136816 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1816136816 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Brits, L.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Opinions of private medical practitioners in Bloemfontein, South Africa, regarding euthanasia of terminally ill patients 
264 1 |c 2009 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The aim of this study was to determine the opinions of private medical practitioners in Bloemfontein, South Africa, regarding euthanasia of terminally ill patients. This descriptive study was performed amongst a simple random sample of 100 of 230 private medical practitioners in Bloemfontein. Information was obtained through anonymous self-administered questionnaires. Written informed consent was obtained. 68 of the doctors selected completed the questionnaire. Only three refused participation because they were opposed to euthanasia. Respondents were mainly male (74.2%), married (91.9%) and Afrikaans-speaking (91.9%). More were specialists (53.2%) than general practitioners (46.8%). A smaller percentage (35.5%) would never consider euthanasia for themselves compared to for their patients (46.8%). The decision should be made by the patient (50%), the patient’s doctor with two colleagues (46.8%), close family (45.2%) or a special committee of specialists in ethics and medicine (37.1%). The majority (46.9%) indicated that euthanasia should be performed by an independent doctor trained in euthanasia, followed by the patient’s doctor (30.7%). Notification should mainly be given to a special committee (49.9%). Only 9.8% felt that no notification was necessary. There was strong opposition to prescribing of medication to let the patient die. Withdrawal of essential medical treatment to speed up death was the most acceptable method. Although the responding group was fairly homogeneous, responses varied widely, indicating the complexity of opinions. 
601 |a Bloemfontein 
601 |a Patient 
700 1 |a Human, L.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Pieterse, L.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Sonnekus, P.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Joubert, G.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of medical ethics  |d London : BMJ Publ., 1975  |g 35(2009), 3, Seite 180-182  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)323607802  |w (DE-600)2026397-1  |w (DE-576)260773972  |x 1473-4257  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:35  |g year:2009  |g number:3  |g pages:180-182 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/27720289  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2008.027417  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u http://jme.bmj.com/content/35/3/180.abstract  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4185590695 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1816136816 
LOK |0 005 20220908053505 
LOK |0 008 220908||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-08-02#AC24331975BCA6B36DFEE0B7E5EF3A436E2CD8A5 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/27720289 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw