Do research ethics committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval?
We analysed research ethics committee (REC) letters. We found that RECs frequently identify process errors in applications from researchers that are not deemed “favourable” at first review. Errors include procedural violations (identified in 74% of all applications), missing information (68%), slip-...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
BMJ Publ.
2009
|
| In: |
Journal of medical ethics
Year: 2009, Volume: 35, Issue: 2, Pages: 130-132 |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1816136697 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230427161242.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220908s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1136/jme.2008.025940 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1816136697 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1816136697 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Angell, E. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Do research ethics committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2009 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a We analysed research ethics committee (REC) letters. We found that RECs frequently identify process errors in applications from researchers that are not deemed “favourable” at first review. Errors include procedural violations (identified in 74% of all applications), missing information (68%), slip-ups (44%) and discrepancies (25%). Important questions arise about why the level of error identified by RECs is so high, and about how errors of different types should be handled. | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Dixon-Woods, M. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of medical ethics |d London : BMJ Publ., 1975 |g 35(2009), 2, Seite 130-132 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)323607802 |w (DE-600)2026397-1 |w (DE-576)260773972 |x 1473-4257 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:35 |g year:2009 |g number:2 |g pages:130-132 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/27720275 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | |u https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Do_research_ethics_committees_identify_process_errors_in_applications_for_ethical_approval_/10099946/1/files/18206777.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2008.025940 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://jme.bmj.com/content/35/2/130.abstract |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 35 |j 2009 |e 2 |h 130-132 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4185590571 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1816136697 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220908053505 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220908||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-08-02#6E1E86932036B042F931F78A4E22678CDF526B44 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/27720275 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||