Ethics briefings

October 2007 is the 40th anniversary of the Abortion Act. The original Act was based on a desire to end backstreet abortions and protect women against the potential harm of undergoing them. Today, access to abortion in Britain is perceived by many as a woman’s reproductive right over her body, altho...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: English, Veronica (Author) ; Hamm, Danielle (Author) ; Harrison, Caroline (Author) ; Mussell, Rebecca (Author) ; Sheather, Julian (Author) ; Sommerville, Ann (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: BMJ Publ. 2007
In: Journal of medical ethics
Year: 2007, Volume: 33, Issue: 9, Pages: 557-558
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1816133345
003 DE-627
005 20220908053442.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220908s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1136/jme.2007.021618  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1816133345 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1816133345 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a English, Veronica  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Ethics briefings 
264 1 |c 2007 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a October 2007 is the 40th anniversary of the Abortion Act. The original Act was based on a desire to end backstreet abortions and protect women against the potential harm of undergoing them. Today, access to abortion in Britain is perceived by many as a woman’s reproductive right over her body, although the notion of “rights” is not reflected in the current legal framework. Public attitudes towards abortion are changing, and the anniversary has prompted calls for revision of the law. Under the current legislation, in order to obtain an abortion, a woman must have a medical justification; two doctors must confirm that she meets the medical criteria, and the abortion must be administered in NHS approved premises. Suggested amendments to the original Abortion Act focus on removing the restrictions women face in accessing abortions in the first trimester of pregnancy and on reducing the current 24-week time limit. Although some public opinion polls indicate support for removing restrictions to accessing first-trimester abortions,1 there is some evidence of reluctance in the medical profession to further liberalisation of access. For example, in May 2007, the general practitioners’ magazine Pulse published the results of a survey of 309 general practitioners showing that one in five did not believe abortion should be legal and one in four would not sign referral forms for women seeking an abortion.2 Discussion concerning abortion featured heavily at the British Medical Association’s (BMA’s) Annual Representative Meeting in June 2007, including the discussion of a motion calling for the removal of the requirement for women to have a medical justification for abortion in the first trimester of pregnancy. Abortion is a sensitive issue in virtually all cultures, and the disparity in views about it is not exclusive to Britain. In 2007, Mexico City legalised abortion in the first … 
700 1 |a Hamm, Danielle  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Harrison, Caroline  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Mussell, Rebecca  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Sheather, Julian  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Sommerville, Ann  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of medical ethics  |d London : BMJ Publ., 1975  |g 33(2007), 9, Seite 557-558  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)323607802  |w (DE-600)2026397-1  |w (DE-576)260773972  |x 1473-4257  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:33  |g year:2007  |g number:9  |g pages:557-558 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/27719944  |x JSTOR 
856 |u https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2598187  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via pmcid lookup)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2007.021618  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u http://jme.bmj.com/content/33/9/557.abstract  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4185587201 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1816133345 
LOK |0 005 20220908053442 
LOK |0 008 220908||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-08-02#1DBA2340A6FCA271CDD4F444E9EA4AEE97E1FF2E 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/27719944 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw