Is respect for autonomy defensible?
Three main claims are made in this paper. First, it is argued that Onora O’Neill has uncovered a serious problem in the way medical ethicists have thought about both respect for autonomy and informed consent. Medical ethicists have tended to think that autonomous choices are intrinsically worthy of...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
BMJ Publ.
2007
|
In: |
Journal of medical ethics
Year: 2007, Volume: 33, Issue: 6, Pages: 353-356 |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1816132896 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220908053440.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220908s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1136/jme.2006.018572 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1816132896 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1816132896 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Wilson, James |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Is respect for autonomy defensible? |
264 | 1 | |c 2007 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Three main claims are made in this paper. First, it is argued that Onora O’Neill has uncovered a serious problem in the way medical ethicists have thought about both respect for autonomy and informed consent. Medical ethicists have tended to think that autonomous choices are intrinsically worthy of respect, and that informed consent procedures are the best way to respect the autonomous choices of individuals. However, O’Neill convincingly argues that we should abandon both these thoughts. Second, it is argued that O’Neill’s proposed solution to this problem is inadequate. O’Neill’s approach requires that a more modest view of the purpose of informed consent procedures be adopted. In her view, the purpose of informed consent procedures is simply to avoid deception and coercion, and the ethical justification for informed consent derives from a different ethical principle, which she calls principled autonomy. It is argued that contrary to what O’Neill claims, the wrongness of coercion cannot be derived from principled autonomy, and so its credentials as a justification for informed consent procedures is weak. Third, it is argued that we do better to rethink autonomy and informed consent in terms of respecting persons as ends in themselves, and a characteristically liberal commitment to allowing individuals to make certain categories of decisions for themselves. | ||
601 | |a Autonomie | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of medical ethics |d London : BMJ Publ., 1975 |g 33(2007), 6, Seite 353-356 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)323607802 |w (DE-600)2026397-1 |w (DE-576)260773972 |x 1473-4257 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:33 |g year:2007 |g number:6 |g pages:353-356 |
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/27719878 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | |u https://europepmc.org/articles/pmc2598284?pdf=render |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH doi match)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2006.018572 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://jme.bmj.com/content/33/6/353.abstract |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4185586752 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1816132896 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220908053440 | ||
LOK | |0 008 220908||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-08-02#290DB86DA5E48572104D57D34161DB8992F872FC | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/27719878 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |