Commentary on Glannon and Ross, and McKay
The patient-doctor relationship has recently come under intense scrutiny, resulting in a re-evaluation of the basis of that relationship. The papers by Glannon and Ross, and McKay seek to identify the sources of authority in the patient-doctor relationship by evaluating it in terms of the concept of...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
BMJ Publ.
2002
|
In: |
Journal of medical ethics
Year: 2002, Volume: 28, Issue: 2, Pages: 74 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1816123048 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230427025716.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220908s2002 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1136/jme.28.2.74 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1816123048 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1816123048 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a McLean, S. A. M. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Commentary on Glannon and Ross, and McKay |
264 | 1 | |c 2002 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The patient-doctor relationship has recently come under intense scrutiny, resulting in a re-evaluation of the basis of that relationship. The papers by Glannon and Ross, and McKay seek to identify the sources of authority in the patient-doctor relationship by evaluating it in terms of the concept of altruism. In this paper I argue that the analysis of Glannon and Ross, and of McKay is unnecessary and that the analysis offered by the latter is also flawed. I do acknowledge, however, that Glannon and Ross's description of doctors' responsibilities and patients' roles has much to commend it. | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of medical ethics |d London : BMJ Publ., 1975 |g 28(2002), 2, Seite 74 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)323607802 |w (DE-600)2026397-1 |w (DE-576)260773972 |x 1473-4257 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:28 |g year:2002 |g number:2 |g pages:74 |
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/27718848 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | |u https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/28/2/74.full.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.28.2.74 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://jme.bmj.com/content/28/2/74.abstract |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
936 | u | w | |d 28 |j 2002 |e 2 |h 74 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4185576889 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1816123048 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220908053334 | ||
LOK | |0 008 220908||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-08-02#C711396278F1C63E4273F22BC5DC1024478D4634 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/27718848 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |