Should Health Screening Be Private?
Jim Thornton gives us in this book a range of arguments against the state funding of nearly all adult health-related screening programmes but for most screening programmes for children and the handicapped. He justifies the first on the basis of consumers being the best judges of their health prefere...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Review |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
BMJ Publ.
2000
|
| In: |
Journal of medical ethics
Year: 2000, Volume: 26, Issue: 3, Pages: 220 |
| Further subjects: | B
Book review
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1816120146 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230427025707.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220908s2000 xx |||||oo 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1136/jme.26.3.220 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1816120146 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1816120146 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Fletcher, John |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Should Health Screening Be Private? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2000 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Jim Thornton gives us in this book a range of arguments against the state funding of nearly all adult health-related screening programmes but for most screening programmes for children and the handicapped. He justifies the first on the basis of consumers being the best judges of their health preferences and adult screening being largely ineffective. He justifies the second on the basis of the belief that neonatal and childhood screening is more effective and that the state has a duty to decide on behalf of those who are not competent … | ||
| 655 | 7 | |a Rezension |0 (DE-588)4049712-4 |0 (DE-627)106186019 |0 (DE-576)209083166 |2 gnd-content | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of medical ethics |d London : BMJ Publ., 1975 |g 26(2000), 3, Seite 220 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)323607802 |w (DE-600)2026397-1 |w (DE-576)260773972 |x 1473-4257 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:26 |g year:2000 |g number:3 |g pages:220 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/27718517 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | |u https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/26/3/220.1.full.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.26.3.220 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://jme.bmj.com/content/26/3/220.1.abstract |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4185572352 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1816120146 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220908053312 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220908||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-08-02#BFFF03AF2117AA60A59C6AA71301B1659A9EF568 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/27718517 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||