Health professionals have an ethical duty . .

The British Medical Association (BMA) recently published guidance from its medical ethics committee on decision making concerning the withholding and withdrawing of life-prolonging medical treatment.1 It is a very thoughtful and thought-provoking document, the ramifications of which go far beyond th...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Williams, Alan (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: BMJ Publ. 2000
In: Journal of medical ethics
Year: 2000, Volume: 26, Issue: 2, Pages: 85-88
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1816119660
003 DE-627
005 20230427025705.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220908s2000 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1136/jme.26.2.85  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1816119660 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1816119660 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Williams, Alan  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Health professionals have an ethical duty . . 
264 1 |c 2000 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The British Medical Association (BMA) recently published guidance from its medical ethics committee on decision making concerning the withholding and withdrawing of life-prolonging medical treatment.1 It is a very thoughtful and thought-provoking document, the ramifications of which go far beyond the immediate situation it is addressing. The authors are clearly well aware of this. When considering a doctor's ethical response to “contemporaneous requests for life-prolonging treatment” made by competent patients, the committee observes: “Although patients' wishes should always be discussed with them, the fact that a patient has requested a particular treatment does not mean that it must always be provided.”2 They advance four propositions in support of this conclusion, namely: Health professionals are not obliged to provide any treatment which cannot produce the desired benefit”.3 There is no obligation to provide any treatment which is clearly contrary to an individual's health interests. A life-prolonging treatment may, for example, prolong life but result in severe pain or loss of function so that overall it produces severe harm to the patient”.4 Except in an emergency situation, doctors are not obliged to treat contrary to their conscience (though they may be obliged to make an appropriate referral)”.4 Where resources are limited, it is inevitable that some patients will not receive all of the treatment they request even though such treatment could be potentially beneficial to them”.4 Towards the end of their commentary on the last of these propositions, they observe: “Health professionals have an ethical duty to make the best use of the available resources and this means that hard decisions must be made. Whilst this is a much broader issue than can be discussed thoroughly in this document, it is clear that doctors are not obliged to comply with patients' requests for treatment when they … 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of medical ethics  |d London : BMJ Publ., 1975  |g 26(2000), 2, Seite 85-88  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)323607802  |w (DE-600)2026397-1  |w (DE-576)260773972  |x 1473-4257  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:26  |g year:2000  |g number:2  |g pages:85-88 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/27718458  |x JSTOR 
856 |u https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/26/2/85.full.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.26.2.85  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u http://jme.bmj.com/content/26/2/85.abstract  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 26  |j 2000  |e 2  |h 85-88 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4185571550 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1816119660 
LOK |0 005 20220908053309 
LOK |0 008 220908||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-08-02#D250350A48C2A87036DB9431044B3420CB79FE89 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/27718458 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw