Double jeopardy, the equal value of lives and the veil of ignorance: a rejoinder to Harris
Harris levels two main criticisms against our original defence of QALYs (Quality Adjusted Life Years). First, he rejects the assumption implicit in the QALY approach that not all lives are of equal value. Second, he rejects our appeal to Rawls's veil of ignorance test in support of the QALY met...
Authors: | ; ; ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
BMJ Publ.
1996
|
In: |
Journal of medical ethics
Year: 1996, Volume: 22, Issue: 4, Pages: 204-208 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 181611426X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220908053230.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220908s1996 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1136/jme.22.4.204 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)181611426X | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP181611426X | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a McKie, J. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Double jeopardy, the equal value of lives and the veil of ignorance: a rejoinder to Harris |
264 | 1 | |c 1996 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Harris levels two main criticisms against our original defence of QALYs (Quality Adjusted Life Years). First, he rejects the assumption implicit in the QALY approach that not all lives are of equal value. Second, he rejects our appeal to Rawls's veil of ignorance test in support of the QALY method. In the present article we defend QALYs against Harris's criticisms. We argue that some of the conclusions Harris draws from our view that resources should be allocated on the basis of potential improvements in quality of life and quantity of life are erroneous, and that others lack the moral implications Harris claims for them. On the other hand, we defend our claim that a rational egoist, behind a veil of ignorance, could consistently choose to allocate life-saving resources in accordance with the QALY method, despite Harris's claim that a rational egoist would allocate randomly if there is no better than a 50% chance of being the recipient. | ||
700 | 1 | |a Kuhse, H. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Richardson, J. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Singer, P. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of medical ethics |d London : BMJ Publ., 1975 |g 22(1996), 4, Seite 204-208 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)323607802 |w (DE-600)2026397-1 |w (DE-576)260773972 |x 1473-4257 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:22 |g year:1996 |g number:4 |g pages:204-208 |
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/27717777 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | |u https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/22/4/204.full.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.22.4.204 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://jme.bmj.com/content/22/4/204.abstract |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
936 | u | w | |d 22 |j 1996 |e 4 |h 204-208 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 418556614X | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 181611426X | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220908053230 | ||
LOK | |0 008 220908||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-08-02#694A8A2B161BE713115B6415FBB2BE93C4D7B98D | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/27717777 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |