Double jeopardy, the equal value of lives and the veil of ignorance: a rejoinder to Harris

Harris levels two main criticisms against our original defence of QALYs (Quality Adjusted Life Years). First, he rejects the assumption implicit in the QALY approach that not all lives are of equal value. Second, he rejects our appeal to Rawls's veil of ignorance test in support of the QALY met...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: McKie, J. (Author) ; Kuhse, H. (Author) ; Richardson, J. (Author) ; Singer, P. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: BMJ Publ. 1996
In: Journal of medical ethics
Year: 1996, Volume: 22, Issue: 4, Pages: 204-208
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 181611426X
003 DE-627
005 20220908053230.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220908s1996 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1136/jme.22.4.204  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)181611426X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP181611426X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a McKie, J.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Double jeopardy, the equal value of lives and the veil of ignorance: a rejoinder to Harris 
264 1 |c 1996 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Harris levels two main criticisms against our original defence of QALYs (Quality Adjusted Life Years). First, he rejects the assumption implicit in the QALY approach that not all lives are of equal value. Second, he rejects our appeal to Rawls's veil of ignorance test in support of the QALY method. In the present article we defend QALYs against Harris's criticisms. We argue that some of the conclusions Harris draws from our view that resources should be allocated on the basis of potential improvements in quality of life and quantity of life are erroneous, and that others lack the moral implications Harris claims for them. On the other hand, we defend our claim that a rational egoist, behind a veil of ignorance, could consistently choose to allocate life-saving resources in accordance with the QALY method, despite Harris's claim that a rational egoist would allocate randomly if there is no better than a 50% chance of being the recipient. 
700 1 |a Kuhse, H.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Richardson, J.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Singer, P.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of medical ethics  |d London : BMJ Publ., 1975  |g 22(1996), 4, Seite 204-208  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)323607802  |w (DE-600)2026397-1  |w (DE-576)260773972  |x 1473-4257  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:22  |g year:1996  |g number:4  |g pages:204-208 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/27717777  |x JSTOR 
856 |u https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/22/4/204.full.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.22.4.204  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u http://jme.bmj.com/content/22/4/204.abstract  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 22  |j 1996  |e 4  |h 204-208 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 418556614X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 181611426X 
LOK |0 005 20220908053230 
LOK |0 008 220908||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-08-02#694A8A2B161BE713115B6415FBB2BE93C4D7B98D 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/27717777 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw