Who should get the kidney machine?
This paper considers the problem that arises when the number of patients who need a resource exceeds the supply. An initial decision-making model is proposed that uses two essential criteria, medical prognosis and the priority of life-threatening situations. The model is then subjected to the critic...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
BMJ Publ.
1992
|
| In: |
Journal of medical ethics
Year: 1992, Volume: 18, Issue: 1, Pages: 12-17 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1816109509 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220908053156.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220908s1992 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1136/jme.18.1.12 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1816109509 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1816109509 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Langford, M. J. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Langford, M. J. | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Who should get the kidney machine? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1992 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This paper considers the problem that arises when the number of patients who need a resource exceeds the supply. An initial decision-making model is proposed that uses two essential criteria, medical prognosis and the priority of life-threatening situations. The model is then subjected to the criticism that it is grotesque to ignore questions relating to the value of, for example, a productive mother over against an aged recluse, and to treat them as having equal rights to access. It is argued that this criticism need not be an expression of prejudice but may reflect a defendable view in which utilitarian considerations enter into the selection process provided that certain fundamental, or 'deontological' rights are observed for all. In the light of the discussion the model is modified in order to contain both a non-utilitarian feature that stresses the intrinsic importance of all persons, and a utilitarian feature that can allow one, in certain circumstances, to take consequences into account, especially those that follow from the 'irreplaceability' of some people. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of medical ethics |d London : BMJ Publ., 1975 |g 18(1992), 1, Seite 12-17 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)323607802 |w (DE-600)2026397-1 |w (DE-576)260773972 |x 1473-4257 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:18 |g year:1992 |g number:1 |g pages:12-17 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/27717126 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | |u https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/18/1/12.full.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.18.1.12 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://jme.bmj.com/content/18/1/12.abstract |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4185561342 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1816109509 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220908053156 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220908||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-08-02#DF6626EC757E02DCCAE6B2D7B212CC5F0DF03DEF | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/27717126 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||