Ethics briefings

In October 2009, the Information Tribunal1 upheld a decision by the Information Commissioner2 to require the Department of Health (DH) to release more detailed data on abortions carried out where “there is a substantial risk that if the child were born it would suffer from such physical or mental ab...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brannan, S. (Autor) ; Davies, M. (Autor) ; English, V. (Autor) ; Mussell, R. (Autor) ; Sheather, J. (Autor) ; Chrispin, E. (Autor) ; Sommerville, A. (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publicado: 2010
En: Journal of medical ethics
Año: 2010, Volumen: 36, Número: 1, Páginas: 63-64
Acceso en línea: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1816101893
003 DE-627
005 20220908053105.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220908s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1136/jme.2009.034272  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1816101893 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1816101893 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Brannan, S.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Ethics briefings 
264 1 |c 2010 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In October 2009, the Information Tribunal1 upheld a decision by the Information Commissioner2 to require the Department of Health (DH) to release more detailed data on abortions carried out where “there is a substantial risk that if the child were born it would suffer from such physical or mental abnormalities as to be seriously handicapped”.3 The DH is appealing the decision.The background to the case spans several years. In 2004, when publicising data from 2003, the DH altered the way it presented the annual abortion statistics for England and Wales. The main drivers for change were the Joanna Jepson case4 and the Department of Health’s concern that data are at higher risk of being used to identify individuals “in light of the availability of the internet and advances in information spread”.5 Guidance from the Office for National Statistics notes that data sets of highly sensitive data, where there are fewer than 10 cases, are at risk of identifying individuals.6As a result, the abortion data from 2003 only listed and provided data for specific groups of medical conditions for which the abortion was carried out, if there were 10 or more cases in total. For example, whereas in the 2002 abortion data, a single case categorised as ‘cleft lip and cleft pallet’ was included (as were nine other medical conditions with fewer than 10 cases)7; in 2003, data were grouped together, or a number was not given, where there were fewer than 10 cases.8The ProLife Alliance (PLA) sought to obtain the previous level of detail for the 2003 abortion data. The PLA lodged a complaint … 
700 1 |a Davies, M.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a English, V.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Mussell, R.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Sheather, J.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Chrispin, E.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Sommerville, A.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of medical ethics  |d London : BMJ Publ., 1975  |g 36(2010), 1, Seite 63-64  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)323607802  |w (DE-600)2026397-1  |w (DE-576)260773972  |x 1473-4257  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:36  |g year:2010  |g number:1  |g pages:63-64 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/20696719  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2009.034272  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u http://jme.bmj.com/content/36/1/63.abstract  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4185553692 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1816101893 
LOK |0 005 20220908053105 
LOK |0 008 220908||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-08-02#86A5C77C06E0B5EFA5CB9F84AABC04D91311ECE5 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/20696719 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw