Embryo loss and double effect
I defend the argument that if embryo loss in stem cell research is morally problematic, then embryo loss in in vivo conception is similarly morally problematic. According to a recent challenge to this argument, we can distinguish between in vivo embryo loss and the in vitro embryo loss of stem cell...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
BMJ Publ.
2013
|
In: |
Journal of medical ethics
Year: 2013, Volume: 39, Issue: 8, Pages: 537-540 |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1816101710 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220908053104.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220908s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1136/medethics-2012-101172 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1816101710 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1816101710 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Di Nucci, Ezio |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
109 | |a Di Nucci, Ezio |a Nucci, Ezio di | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Embryo loss and double effect |
264 | 1 | |c 2013 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a I defend the argument that if embryo loss in stem cell research is morally problematic, then embryo loss in in vivo conception is similarly morally problematic. According to a recent challenge to this argument, we can distinguish between in vivo embryo loss and the in vitro embryo loss of stem cell research by appealing to the doctrine of double effect. I argue that this challenge fails to show that in vivo embryo loss is a mere unintended side effect while in vitro embryo loss is an intended means and that, even if we refine the challenge by appealing to Michael Bratman's three roles of intention, the distinction is still unwarranted. | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of medical ethics |d London : BMJ Publ., 1975 |g 39(2013), 8, Seite 537-540 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)323607802 |w (DE-600)2026397-1 |w (DE-576)260773972 |x 1473-4257 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:39 |g year:2013 |g number:8 |g pages:537-540 |
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/43282814 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | |u https://philpapers.org/archive/DINELA.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-101172 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://jme.bmj.com/content/39/8/537.abstract |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 418555351X | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1816101710 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220908053104 | ||
LOK | |0 008 220908||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-08-03#0C67D5775B5E662BB843CB5E1192E1F97E30B519 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/43282814 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |