Question of the Authorship of the Commentary on the prophet Isaiah (CPG 2911): from Erasmus to Garnier and His Followers

The article considers arguments presented by Erasmus of Rotterdam, Julien Garnier and their modern followers against the authenticity of the Commentary on the Prophet Isaiah, which has been preserved in mansucsripts as a work of Basil the Great. A survey of the correspondence of Erasmus and of the c...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lipatov-Chicherin, Nikolai (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Pubblicazioni Agostiniane 2022
In: Augustinianum
Year: 2022, Volume: 62, Issue: 1, Pages: 121-153
IxTheo Classification:KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity
KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1815394803
003 DE-627
005 20221108161134.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220830s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.5840/agstm20226216  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1815394803 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1815394803 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Lipatov-Chicherin, Nikolai  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Question of the Authorship of the Commentary on the prophet Isaiah (CPG 2911)  |b from Erasmus to Garnier and His Followers 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The article considers arguments presented by Erasmus of Rotterdam, Julien Garnier and their modern followers against the authenticity of the Commentary on the Prophet Isaiah, which has been preserved in mansucsripts as a work of Basil the Great. A survey of the correspondence of Erasmus and of the circumstances of his attempted translation of the book shows that his critical judgement on the authorship was motivated by the need to justify his abandoning of the project of translation rather than by the evidence of the text itself. The first systematic examination of Garnier’s critical dossier demonstrates that his statements about the incompatibility of many linguistic features of the Commentary with undisputed writings of Basil are not supported by the text of his own edition of the book. Moreover, his rigid criteria for stylistic analysis are based on misleading notions about textual aspects of the creation and transmission of Patristic works. Isolated observations of the modern followers of the Maurist need to be assessed on the basis of a new and critical edition of the text; however, without the support of his numerous unfounded arguments, they are not sufficient by themselves to refute the attribution of the book in the manuscript tradition. 
601 |a Prophet 
601 |a Erasmus 
652 |a KAB:KAH 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Augustinianum  |d Roma : Pubblicazioni Agostiniane, 1961  |g 62(2022), 1, Seite 121-153  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)83589150X  |w (DE-600)2835523-4  |w (DE-576)445969504  |x 2162-6499  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:62  |g year:2022  |g number:1  |g pages:121-153 
856 4 0 |u http://www.pdcnet.org/oom/service?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=&rft.imuse_id=agstm_2022_0062_0001_0121_0153&svc_id=info:www.pdcnet.org/collection  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.5840/agstm20226216  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4183619572 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1815394803 
LOK |0 005 20221108161134 
LOK |0 008 220830||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044624  |a KAH 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044284  |a KAB 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw