Consenting Under Third-Party Coercion
This paper focuses on consent and third-party coercion, viz. cases in which a person consents to another person performing a certain act because a third party coerced her into doing so. I argue that, in these cases, the validity of consent depends on the behavior of the recipient of consent rather t...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
2022
|
In: |
Journal of moral philosophy
Year: 2022, Volume: 19, Issue: 4, Pages: 361-389 |
Further subjects: | B
voluntariness
B Consent B third-party coercion B Autonomy B Responsibility |
Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1814219374 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230118120847.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220812s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/17455243-20213548 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1814219374 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1814219374 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)127848387X |0 (DE-627)1831403668 |4 aut |a Kiener, Maximilian | |
109 | |a Kiener, Maximilian | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Consenting Under Third-Party Coercion |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This paper focuses on consent and third-party coercion, viz. cases in which a person consents to another person performing a certain act because a third party coerced her into doing so. I argue that, in these cases, the validity of consent depends on the behavior of the recipient of consent rather than the third party’s coercion taken separately, and I will specify the conditions under which consent is invalid. My view, which is a novel version of what I call a Recipient-Focus-View, holds that coercion invalidates consent only if consent was ‘obtained by’ coercion, but not if consent was ‘merely motivated by’ coercion. I explain and support my view on the basis that it best reconciles an unnoticed tension between two fundamental principles in the debate on consent (which I call the Coercion Principle and the Permissibility Principle) and that it can deal with cases that undermine other Recipient-Focus-Views. | ||
650 | 4 | |a voluntariness | |
650 | 4 | |a Responsibility | |
650 | 4 | |a Consent | |
650 | 4 | |a third-party coercion | |
650 | 4 | |a Autonomy | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of moral philosophy |d Leiden : Brill, 2004 |g 19(2022), 4, Seite 361-389 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)474382281 |w (DE-600)2169771-1 |w (DE-576)273875329 |x 1745-5243 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:19 |g year:2022 |g number:4 |g pages:361-389 |
856 | |u https://brill.com/downloadpdf/journals/jmp/aop/article-10.1163-17455243-20213548/article-10.1163-17455243-20213548.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via page says license)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-20213548 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://brill.com/view/journals/jmp/19/4/article-p361_002.xml |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4178656651 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1814219374 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220812052538 | ||
LOK | |0 008 220812||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-08-11#2A464DDF57FD2AE1AF4559F86655CE834204352E | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |